| Author | Topic: new jupiter 8 VSTi | |||||||||
| zas | Posted: 21st August 2001 19:11 | |||||||||
listen up....all ye virtual synth programmers
I had a vision....playing retro hits from the 80s on a lurvely Roland Jupiter 8 vsti instrument within my vst host with all the original synth patches........what a dream....they did it the the prophet 5, minimoog and ppg wave, why not a roland jupiter 8? I think if enough people replied im sure programmers will listen. Has to be original though, no make believes(based on sound samples)...whats this forum think then...are you in??? Zas new mix music | ||||||||||
| David Abraham | Posted: 21st August 2001 20:06 | |||||||||
sure I hope all the classic synths get modeled...but hold on a second, somebody needs to do a great Triton model first. I'd pay top dollar for that...almost as much as the real thing.
-david abraham [ 21 August 2001: Message edited by: David Abraham Fenton ] | ||||||||||
| Raven | Posted: 21st August 2001 20:12 | |||||||||
Cool | ||||||||||
| crimsonwarlock | Posted: 22nd August 2001 05:41 | |||||||||
I would love to see a Jup-8 vsti, but I think some available vsti's are allready capable of some jupiter-like sounds (the Muon Electron comes to mind).
But to be able to use existing Jupiter 8 patches a closely modelled vsti (like they did with the Pro52) would be a killer | ||||||||||
| exponent | Posted: 22nd August 2001 07:27 | |||||||||
Im all for it, but it'd have to be a living breathing product, like the pro52 has become, for example.
The more a product is refined, optimised and suppourted the more it becomes a legit useable instrument. (in best case scenarios of course) The first thing on the agenda? would be getting the sound "authentic" and yeah a nice 3-d modelled interface with the primary colored roland-style buttons would all be nice to work with. If executed properly it could be a very succcesful product. But not if it's just a novelty. And as lotuz points out you can find a similar sounds in some existing instruments... Next the arp 2600 vsti!!!?? ![]() | ||||||||||
| Pepe | Posted: 22nd August 2001 07:28 | |||||||||
| Gullet | Posted: 22nd August 2001 16:51 | |||||||||
Arp 2600, that would be really cool!
I would be satisfied with a CS80 or a jupiter 8 as well /David | ||||||||||
| crimsonwarlock | Posted: 23rd August 2001 12:35 | |||||||||
Hey Exponent, I dont see Lotuz in this thread (yet) so I think you meant me Thinking back to my favorit synths of days gone by, I always drooled over the PPG and the Prophet 5, the Jupiter 8, MemoryMoog and the mother of phat synthstrings: the Oberheim OB-Xa. As im working on a MemoryMoog in Sync Modular, I only need the pro plugin developers to get me a jup8 and a Ob-Xa | ||||||||||
| Lotuz | Posted: 23rd August 2001 12:52 | |||||||||
quote | ||||||||||
| Har | Posted: 23rd August 2001 13:01 | |||||||||
quote: I definitely gotta second that ARP 2600 to go along with the JP-8!! Ooooh, a VSTi CS80...sweet! Instant Eddie Jobson/UK: I can already feel my fingers reaching for the keys to play "In The Dead Of Night" or "Alaska"....aaah, the memories... --Har [ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Har ] | ||||||||||
| crimsonwarlock | Posted: 23rd August 2001 16:55 | |||||||||
Hey Lotuz, seems we Dutch all look alike ...hehehe, but as I said, you where not YET in this thread... e voila | ||||||||||
| Lotuz | Posted: 23rd August 2001 17:44 | |||||||||
Where's this thread's exit? | ||||||||||
| audio/fault | Posted: 23rd August 2001 17:59 | |||||||||
Hey Pepe,
your link contained one "!" to much. The right link is http://www.rgcaudio.com/Pentagon_I.htm . Sorry for being that exact greetZ ANdreas [ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Cubaseuser ] | ||||||||||
| Durk | Posted: 23rd August 2001 19:34 | |||||||||
quote: huh? quote: Got to the top of the screen, then go left until you're above a icon with a cross. Click on you're left button, and you're gone Dash did a Jupiter 8 for Reaktor: http://www.dash-site.com/synths/jupitar8.htm [ 23 August 2001: Message edited by: Dumb Ass Durruk ] | ||||||||||
| exponent | Posted: 23rd August 2001 20:36 | |||||||||
haha sorry peter (lotuz), guess i was reading the threads a bit hastily that day huh? Never thought of a cs-80, but that would also make a lot of sense, seeing how it weighs as much as a pa system, and costs almost as much as 2600... even cs50's are expensive *compared to average vsti prices* Peter if we're going into oberheim territory how about the matrix 12, the ob-8 or (pair this one with the "2600 vsti") the expander? None of these synths can reliably be had in true working order for under 700$ (or almost twice as much if you want cs80, 2600, matrix12, expander) , so any accurate repesentation of them in vsti would be fun, inspiring, and probobly very useful to some, as all the synths we're mentioning have a individual "sound" or "sound pallate" that's able to be pinned down somewhat.. Any of these synths that have been mentioned would take a fair measure of commitment from the developer, as i mentioned before. This leaves me guessing that companies like native instruments, tc electronic, or waldorf/steinberg would be the most likly contenders.. im not saying i dont believe in the independent software houses, in fact inch for inch the talent is booming there!! it's just you would likly need a sizeable budget/time to emulate an instrument if you're serious about it (i.e. not just slapping a vintage interface on a synth that is already in your code library in bits and pieces?) Honestly i would appreciate ANYTHING decent that comes out, and i usually do. But more isnt always better, since it can lead to the "there's already a virtual jupiter8" phenomenon, which you dont want to see unless the synth actually SOUNDS kinda like a jupiter8.. Also we dont want developers to stop experimenting with weird new synth arhitechtures in the meantime. If i had the choice there would be a few companies/developers JUST devoted to creating nearly hardware accurate clones in vsti format, all with stand alone players for patch programming like in the pro52... Another thing that i think would be cool for vst (FX)plugins is a pack that is all "accurate" recreations of famous vintage pedal processors.. ie electroharmonics basssynth/minisynthesizer, electric mistress flanger, big muff pedal, rat distortion, etc probobly just as tough to do, and just an idea. Or AMP/speaker cabinet simulators, that are preamp models of dozens of specific types of amps in one plugin .. like the hardware pod/podpro with blackface fender, tweed, brit stack, etc.. all with fully programmable and automated interfaces. Now don't go thinking that this would only be for guitar work, no way. The hardware preamp units can be used creatively on any input stream, so could this type of plugin.. i mean i'm sure it's possible.. the models in the hardware units are fully digital anyway. Maybe im looking too deep into small things, but it cant hurt huh? | ||||||||||
| Funkybot | Posted: 24th August 2001 00:46 | |||||||||
quote | ||||||||||
| audio/fault | Posted: 24th August 2001 05:52 | |||||||||
Hey Exponent, I think you should go out more! -only joking!. Back to our topic: What about a VSTi of the Omega 8 or ATC-1 by Studio Electronics with a Filter Selector. So we would have an ARP 2600-, an Oberheim-, a Moog- and a TB 303-Filter(maybe some other Filters could be added). greetZ ANdreas | ||||||||||
| crimsonwarlock | Posted: 24th August 2001 05:56 | |||||||||
quote: Thank you quote |










