| Author | Topic: 24 /96 |
| Deadbeat | Posted: 13th March 2002 17:29 |
Hi All sorry for the cross post, I need to get as much info on this as
possible..... I'm about to start a new recording project and I need to take a quick poll of sorts. How many of you are ACTUALLY USING 24/96 recording at this point ? Does it really make a huge difference ? And before anyone takes this opportunity to recite everything they've ever read in the magazines regarding this issue, please spare me the propaganda , I 'm just looking for real world experiences ... Thanks a bunch in advance.... | |
| Funkybot | Posted: 13th March 2002 18:21 |
I use 24/44. It just saves that extra bit of ever important hard drive space. I'd definately stick to 24 bit recording though, 16 just doesn't cut it after you start adding a bunch of tracks. But as for the 44 vs 96 debate I'm staying out of that one. |









