KVR Audio is the Internet's number one news and information resource for open standard audio plugins. We report new releases, product announcements and product updates (major and minor) for all VST Plugins, DirectX Plugins and Audio Units Plugins. We manage a fully searchable audio plugin database (updated daily), and offer many free member services including user reviews, product update notifications and a very active discussion forum. We also host official support forums for many plugin developers plus the official Receptor support forum.
Plug-in Database: Virtual
Instruments, Effects & Hosts
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Plug-in Ratings
by KVR Members
Wiki: Tutorials,
Audio Lexicon, ...
Listen to Music
by KVR Members
Search
KVR

Google Powered Search:

in new window

KVR Powered Plug-in Search:

AuthorTopic: if a vsti could only do this...
prophet
Posted: 13th March 2002 10:30
imagine hearing a sound you like, maybe in your favourite song and wishing you could not only have the same synth used, but that same patch, same eq settings etc. well now it might be possible. Theres a new synth coming called 'Neuron Adaptive analyizer' which supposedly takes a sound and replicates it. not like sampling or loading a sound into an oscillator but actually replicates that sound so you can play it, resequence it etc. the synth actually becomes that sound. it says that it is a completely new way of synthesis. the closest you can get to the sound in your head.

check it out.

http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM02/Content/Hartmann_Music/PR/Neur on.html

although it says that it has a lot of dsp power, i dont think its really required if you have a software version, as after the analysing which would be the most complicating thing, its simply just playing back that patch. so really, you could have a vsti version easy i think, if someone knew how to engineer it.
bluey
Posted: 13th March 2002 11:53
I cant believe they have that SHITTY flash on their site still ! I mean come on its bloody awefull and I cant hear anything.

Maybe its a tactic to keep the suspense up.
Collusion
Posted: 13th March 2002 16:36
quote:
Originally posted by bluey:
Maybe its a tactic to keep the suspense up.

You do get the impression that the instrument is still in development...... [Roll Eyes]
Mr. Tunes
Posted: 13th March 2002 19:50
I have a feeling that this Neuron thing never existed in the first place in this is some conspiracy by the CIA to detract your attention while the bureau of investigation goes into our homes and steals our real synths that actually do exist

This neuron is science fiction at it's best, and it's even substantiated with a picture of the thing(that prototype is a sham)
etherdesign
Posted: 13th March 2002 23:19
Well it's definately being developed, they were supposed to have a bunch of them at NAMM but I guess they weren't really ready because all but one of them arrived DOA.. But they did have it up and running at NAMM, no one was allowed to record any of the sounds it made though..

Well.. it is starting to sound a bit odd.. hah..
Media Lint
Posted: 14th March 2002 03:25
This wasn't from the Tech Page of the April edition of EM Magazine now was it?
MArmstrong
Posted: 15th March 2002 01:54
brill idea but if we just duplicated pre-existing sounds wouldn't it get a bit boring after a while? It would be nice but I think I agree with tunes, sounds like a bit of the x-files or something similar. Government conspiracy anyone? [Big Grin]

Michael
Mr. Tunes
Posted: 15th March 2002 17:18
This synthsampler hybrid wonder machine looks really cool to think about.

It makes you think about the evolution of modern science and how far we've come.
Squids
Posted: 15th March 2002 17:35
Oh, the Neuron. That's what this thread is about? Yeah, it would be cool if this was in software. It would also be nice if it wasn't around $5,000.

But, I can tell you that it does exist. I saw it and heard it at the NAMM show. WICKED sound! Really weird. The guy who played it had silver hair and he was just tripping me out with it. It was more of a sound mangler though and sort of like "effects" the way he was using it...slowing things down and changing formants in real time to sampled beats and stuff. It had so many joysticks on it and I think the LEDS are also buttons! There is also one wood side panel and the other has jacks on it which I think is hilarious.

I think most of the units except one were in fact DOA. I have the brochure on it which has poetry in it! A very unusual offering. I wonder if it will really see the light of day. Hmmmm.
realmarco
Posted: 15th March 2002 18:13
quote:
Originally posted by Squids:


I think most of the units except one were in fact DOA.

you mean they were not workink /broken...hmm that doesn't sound too comforting(though I don't always believe everything that i read....hint hint newbies)
nuffink
Posted: 15th March 2002 18:27
quote:
Fortunately, these anoraks, the synthesis equivalent of trainspotters, are a dying breed. They used to lie in wait for unsuspecting journalists on the cheaper stands away from the main thoroughfares at trade shows, and having lured you into their lair, waffle on endlessly about how the pure additive system they had developed using mountains of public funding at some third-rate university in the middle of nowhere, could theoretically reproduce any sound with the right programming. But when you finally got them to play you something, it always sounded like a rather cheap, thin drawbar organ (a primitive additive synthesiser in itself, but usually somewhat more cost-effective than their monstrous prototype).


From sound on sound January 97
File name: /sos/1997_articles/jan97/kawaik5000w.html

plus ca change...
Forum topics in the archive are read only. New posts should be made in the main KVR Forums.
Disclaimer:
All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).