| Author | Topic: Finally tried Angelina |
| Caleb | Posted: 22nd June 2002 11:06 |
Well, I finally got around to installing the demo of Angelina on my computer.
Let me think - roughly 1 minute later I bought it.
It's so lush and cozy it makes me want to drift away. I still think it sounds very little like people but who the hell cares. I love pad sounds like this, they slowly tease you from behind all the music making you want to see what heaven is really like. Yep - Angelina is a bloody good name for it because it produced the sound that angels make. BLOODY GOOD STUFF Nuff said. | |
| TristezaOrange | Posted: 22nd June 2002 12:49 |
Yeah, great toy, but what's the limitation in the demo exactly? I HAVE TO KNOW!!!! | |
| Scratch | Posted: 22nd June 2002 17:58 |
I like this synth too. To me it sounds a bit harsh though -like a mellotron. Are there any plans on smoothing out the sound so it sounds more sharp with glass like choirs? | |
| Big Tick | Posted: 23rd June 2002 04:53 |
Thanks CB for the nice comments,
The demo simply has saving and automation disabled. Glass-like sounds... hmm... Have you tried playing around with the "granular" knob a bit ? I'll try to make a short mp3 and post it here. 'Tick | |
| Big Tick | Posted: 23rd June 2002 05:07 |
| Scratch | Posted: 23rd June 2002 14:19 |
Hello Big Tick,
I listned to your demo. I like your synth and all but I still think it would be better if it could be more sharp, like a crystal clear choir. It sounds a bit fuzzy. Am I making sense to anyone or it may just be me. Turning off the breath control and granular helps to ease this fuzzyness. Im no sound techy guy but I think its the ossilators. | |
| Teksonik | Posted: 23rd June 2002 16:09 |
I agree with JROCC.Angelina makes very nice pads but I was expecting a more realistic choir sound like the Oooohs and Ahhhs we are all familiar with from various hardware synths/soundfonts.It has a very unique sound and I love the formant morphing.I was just a little disappointed in the basic waveforms.Still Angelina is a great deal.
[ 23 June 2002, 22:46: Message edited by: Marc555 ] | |
| CapnLockheed | Posted: 23rd June 2002 16:32 |
On the otherhand she's a dirty, filthy, little
angel....and I love her for it. Honestly,
I liek the fuzzywuzzyness. If I want clean choirs, I'll use FM or any of the multitude of sampled choirs out there. Cheers.....CL ![]() | |
| Casar | Posted: 23rd June 2002 19:41 |
I think this is a wonderful softsynth and a very nice concept. It has a character which fits nicely to Phil Spector type of arrangements for example. I hope the concept will expand further, it would be nice with even more depth and definition to the sounds. | |
| n0 | Posted: 23rd June 2002 20:48 |
| Scratch | Posted: 23rd June 2002 20:57 |
To be honest Ill be the first to own up, I dont know what microtuning is. Enlighten me. | |
| n0 | Posted: 23rd June 2002 21:18 |
| Caleb | Posted: 24th June 2002 00:52 |
To tell you the truth. one of the first things I noticed about Angelina was that it didn't sound realistic at all.
But I had come to grips with that a long time ago. I bought it because it produces a wonderful, surreal pad sound. And I love pads. |


![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)







