| Author | Topic: Atmosphere, Trilogy, Stylus | |||
| gassle | Posted: 20th February 2003 10:47 | |||
![]() I just received my copies of Atmosphere, Trilogy and Stylus! Here are my first impressions with some surprise http://www.iloyd.com/studio.htm PS. Don't get hot on me if they appear too be too positive! TG | ||||
| Patrick de Caumette | Posted: 20th February 2003 12:12 | |||
Nice graphics! Did you do them for Eric or just for fun | ||||
| whitey | Posted: 20th February 2003 12:40 | |||
very nice, don't you wish hardware like that existed? | ||||
| gassle | Posted: 20th February 2003 12:43 | |||
Thanks LP. I had done the Reason images for fun but I did the Spectrasonics modules for Eric. An other 3D shot is visible at Spectrasonics NAMM booth photos.
TG | ||||
| AD80 | Posted: 20th February 2003 12:51 | |||
I dont. It would cost $10,000 probably | ||||
| lights | Posted: 20th February 2003 14:10 | |||
Well I actually wish there was hardware like that and that I could afford it. You know everytime i get hooked on a software instrument I find myself wishing it was reincarnatedd into hardware. Is it just me or would we all love to have a studio full of harware if the money was of no concern. The graphocs do look terrific. | ||||
| pHz | Posted: 20th February 2003 14:29 | |||
call me odd - but no - i prefer having it all in one box having said that - for the stuff i do [deliberately lofi] - i dont care too much about absolute sonic fidelity so the hardware / software split doesnt concern me too much slainte | ||||
| progfusion74 | Posted: 20th February 2003 14:43 | |||
I am with experimentfour. I like good sound. software gives me the advantage of having everything in one box. Only place I drool over hardware is keyboards. I am a sucker there, which is why I am glad that the minimoog voyager and alesis andromeda are so expensive prog | ||||
| gassle | Posted: 20th February 2003 15:22 | |||
Me too, prefer to have my synths in one box, but I enjoy seeing 3D incarnations of softsynths. They help me to grasp what I have in my computer and encourage me to explore its potentials. I think, sometimes it is easier to omit a synthesizer if it is in software form... perhaps because it hurts the wallet much less than a hardware. Only thing I hate about softsynths is that being always have to worry about the CPU! TG | ||||
| AD80 | Posted: 20th February 2003 15:45 | |||
Me four. I much rather have my gear in a single enviroment where I can switch things around and add as many synths as I want and load as big a sample as I want. Having 7 diffrent instances of Pro-53 is much more convenient than actually having a room full of Prophets V's. I dont think CPU load will be much of an issue when the new Mac processors, and the new Intel and AMD processors come out. | ||||
| progfusion74 | Posted: 20th February 2003 15:46 | |||
heck CPU load is not too much of a hassle with my current xp2000+
prog | ||||
| Patrick de Caumette | Posted: 20th February 2003 16:43 | |||
That's what i thought with my dual 2 x 1.6 Ghz until i started hitting 80 % on a regular basis (more power=more toys) | ||||
| progfusion74 | Posted: 20th February 2003 16:46 | |||
That's probably true. I could bring it to my knees if I want to, esp using something like Reaktor and discovery, but with crystal and z3ta+ I do fine, but then I know that as we move along, CPU load will become a lesser problems (I know that all too well from work) | ||||
| lights | Posted: 21st February 2003 15:17 | |||
Alright, guess it's just me then.
Probably it's a depravity complex from the days when the only way to get a moog was to buy a moog and i couldn't afford more than a roland home keyboard with humilating green and purple buttons. Mind you I was only about twelve then. Probably explains my tendancy to lust over the software re-enacrnations of old synths. |











