KVR Audio is the Internet's number one news and information resource for open standard audio plugins. We report new releases, product announcements and product updates (major and minor) for all VST Plugins, DirectX Plugins and Audio Units Plugins. We manage a fully searchable audio plugin database (updated daily), and offer many free member services including user reviews, product update notifications and a very active discussion forum. We also host official support forums for many plugin developers plus the official Receptor support forum.
Plug-in Database: Virtual
Instruments, Effects & Hosts
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Plug-in Ratings
by KVR Members
Wiki: Tutorials,
Audio Lexicon, ...
Listen to Music
by KVR Members
Search
KVR

Google Powered Search:

in new window

KVR Powered Plug-in Search:

AuthorTopic: Any Hypersonic users?
CadeBryant
Posted: 7th January 2004 12:39
I just purchased Steinberg's Hypersonic last night and am learning the ropes. Has anyone here used it?

One question I had: it advertises 1024 voices of polyphony, but when I go into any given patch, the max # of voices I can assign it is 64. I don't think this is due to the limitation of my hardware, as I'm running a 2.2Ghz processor and 768MB of RAM. Is this a bug? Or are a max of 64 voices hardwired to each of the 16 channels (16 x 64 = 1024)?
DevonB
Posted: 7th January 2004 12:54
Sounds right to me. You concerned with exceeding 64 note polyphony on a single channel?

Devon
ericj23
Posted: 7th January 2004 13:05
must have the kind of fluttering fingers that could make him very popular in some circles
CadeBryant
Posted: 7th January 2004 13:08
DevonB wrote:
Sounds right to me. You concerned with exceeding 64 note polyphony on a single channel?

Devon


Probably not in most circumstances (unless I'm doing a piano concerto). I was just wondering if this is how it's supposed to behave.
Roman Empire
Posted: 7th January 2004 13:45
Thatīs right, but if youīd need 1024 voices for one sound you could load the same one into all 16 slots Smile
I really like working with Hypersonic. Itīs so light on CPU, and they really spent time on making it as easy to use as possible; all other plugin developers could learn from it architecture.
But a big minus is that with the current version you arenīt allowed to edit many parameters. Itīs too close to just being an advanced sample player like Sampletank, which is disappointing because the advertisement makes you think it can do alot more.
But accourding to another thread a few week backs here on kvr, the next release should have much more access to changing of sounds!
So when that comes out, and thereīll be more sounds available, then itīs gonna be hard to beat it Smile
CadeBryant
Posted: 7th January 2004 14:44
Roman, I also like the ease with which you can compose music with Hypersonic; it gives you instant access to your creativity without having to search around for sounds or wait forever for huge samples to load up. I especially like the drum kit constructor in the combi menu that lets you dial in different sounds on the fly for each drum.

One disapointment I had, though, is that many of the sounds seem a bit "thin" for my taste, particularly the electric pianos and strings. I was expecting to find some fat, luscious, room-filling string pads, some Rhodes and DX EPs that were dynamic and responsive, and some rich, layered "ballad pianos" (combination of grand piano and electric piano stacks) similar to those in the Korg Triton and other hardware workstations - but I haven't found anything like this. Any suggestions?
Roman Empire
Posted: 8th January 2004 12:04
CadeBryant wrote:
One disapointment I had, though, is that many of the sounds seem a bit "thin" for my taste, particularly the electric pianos and strings. I was expecting to find some fat, luscious, room-filling string pads, some Rhodes and DX EPs that were dynamic and responsive, and some rich, layered "ballad pianos" (combination of grand piano and electric piano stacks) similar to those in the Korg Triton and other hardware workstations - but I haven't found anything like this. Any suggestions?


Untill more sounds are released, what about playing around with EQīing the existing patches a bit? I think that feature - at least - is implented with all patches. That would maybe solve the thinness problem, but of course not help you with particular waves that are not there.
Forum topics in the archive are read only. New posts should be made in the main KVR Forums.
Disclaimer:
All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).