| Author | Topic: B4 VS CHARLIE? | |
| PeeBs | Posted: 31st January 2004 11:11 | |
Hi,Want to get a organ,in software,and I was going to get B4 but I see there's a "new kid on the block" Charlie.As anyone heard both?And what did you think? | ||
| donkey tugger | Posted: 31st January 2004 11:17 | |
Hmm, dunno, but before you spend any cash, try this bugger;
http://www.soundfonts.it/vst/ORGANized/ Rather impressive I thought. | ||
| peteralston | Posted: 31st January 2004 12:09 | |
or do a search for Dirtbag or Lightbag | ||
| ik | Posted: 31st January 2004 12:14 | |
The Bag http://s93683780.onlinehome.us/bag2Home.htm ik. | ||
| g.py | Posted: 31st January 2004 17:25 | |
There is also ZR-3, from Rumpelrausch Taips.
It is freeware, and it's sounding very very good : http://rumpelrausch.de.vu/ Guillaume | ||
| vigrani | Posted: 31st January 2004 18:24 | |
NuBi, is the answer, | ||
| Angus_FX | Posted: 1st February 2004 08:34 | |
From what I can make out, Charlie is UVI-based... look very closely at those screenshots, what look like drawbars are in fact controllers for the ADSR envelope Doesn't mean it won't sound good, but still... makes you wonder. | ||
| Pro-Sounds | Posted: 1st February 2004 08:39 | |
Think PlugSound module specifically for Organ sounds The difference will be that B4 is an emulation of a B3, whereas Charlie has a wide range of organs covered. | ||
| Phaedo | Posted: 1st February 2004 08:49 | |
Put it this way, Hammond Organs are pretty complex beasts, what with the tonewheels and all. What makes you think any sampled sound set would do as good a job as one of the best pieces of modelling on the market? | ||
| Pro-Sounds | Posted: 1st February 2004 09:02 | |
I personally use B4 | ||
| Durk | Posted: 1st February 2004 09:58 | |
What about daOrgan? | ||
| pj geerlings | Posted: 2nd February 2004 13:34 | |
This is so true - it took a great deal of work to get NuBi's tonewheel engine to sound "right" in terms of consistant phase/frequency relationships. Any non-trivial fixed length organ sample will not have this - particularly if the scale is "well tempered". In this case the frequency set is based on irrational numbers - there is simply no valid loop point. -And- the inuitive approach (drawbars frequencies based on the root frequency of each note) does not work either ... Try this simple test with your favorite Hammond Emulation VSTi : (1) turn off all effects (no leslie / no vibrato) (2) completely pull out the 8' drawbar and the 1 3/5' drawbar - only those two for this test(!) (3) play middle C and the E above high C. Engine designs which use the intuitive approach will have a very strong beat between the natural fifth harmonic of the middle C (the 1 3/5' drawbar) and the well tempered diatonic third from the E above high C. Have fun! --pj geerlings | ||
| bandasound | Posted: 2nd February 2004 20:24 | |
i tried some of those B3 emulators....and i still use the NI B4...i do think it could use an update for tone and thickness but if they put more R&D in B4 it will seriously become more of the standard and more playable...i like to get percy poppy sound like on Tower of power like funk organ...and i think a better distortion...and a more chorusy leslie.....they did a fine job...why did they just stop at 1.1 ? | ||
| Finbar Saunders | Posted: 2nd February 2004 20:42 | |
Check out Lightbag II. It's free so you've got nothing to loose. |










