| Author | Topic: any one like the garritan personal orchestra? | |
| goodickin | Posted: 9th July 2004 09:30 | |
any one like the garritan personal orchestra? im thinking of picking one up , reviews seem to be pretty cool and the demos sound really well for a 300 dollar program
http://www.garritan.com/ | ||
| Yossarian | Posted: 9th July 2004 09:47 | |
Do a forum search for GPO and you’ll find lots of opinions.
/Yoss | ||
| DevonB | Posted: 9th July 2004 09:50 | |
Or read my review over on http://www.traxmusic.org under Reviews. | ||
| whyterabbyt | Posted: 9th July 2004 10:24 | |
Its the best orchestral library I own. | ||
| M Gardner | Posted: 9th July 2004 12:03 | |
Its the one library I have tended not to use much. Not that I think there's much wrong with it but I've just got other libraries that do the business better. Problem is that when I bought it along with the Silver orchestra, my only other main orchestra library was the Vitous. Once I updated from Silver to Gold and purchased a few others like Sonic Implants Strings, the Garritan seemed pretty poor by comparison.
Sometimes its just worth paying a bit extra for something better. But the Garritan website is just impeccable and help is on tap there. They really know their customer service and how to impress visually! | ||
| DevonB | Posted: 9th July 2004 12:10 | |
Let's put it in perspective here. GPO $249 Symphonic Strings $895 QLSO Gold $999 A bit extra? That looks a LOT more than a 'bit' extra. Devon | ||
| VitaminD | Posted: 9th July 2004 13:14 | |
| M Gardner | Posted: 9th July 2004 16:25 | |
[quote="DevonB]Let's put it in perspective here.
GPO $249 Symphonic Strings $895 QLSO Gold $999 A bit extra? That looks a LOT more than a 'bit' extra. Devon[/quote] Well, I was thinking directly of EWQLSO Gold, which is much better IMO and not extravagantly more. | ||
| Sepheritoh | Posted: 9th July 2004 16:45 | |
Yes | ||
| ugo | Posted: 10th July 2004 20:08 | |
i love GPO. imho, it sounds great and works well. i havent had any troubles with it.
from what i can tell from QLSO's mp3's, GPO's tone is much warmer and far less of a hollywood "in your face" kind of sound. i wanted the warmth so i chose GPO and im very happy that i did. its been worth every penny to me. -ugo | ||
| DevonB | Posted: 10th July 2004 20:29 | |
Well, maybe to you or I, it's not extravagently more, BUT the market it's destined for, the poor college student, it's already high enough as is. Not to mention, I've seen a *LOT* of guys on here that $300 is their budget for the year, period, if not less. At any rate, GPO gives them everything they need, esp if they have nothing. But for you or I who might be demanding the best of the best and already have tons of sequencers, and samples, etc., it's a different story. In short, Gary nailed his market perfectly with the right product with the right price. Devon | ||
| akgk55 | Posted: 11th July 2004 02:51 | |
Hi new to KVR. I don't have GPO but the demos on their site sound very, very convincing | ||
| alpi | Posted: 11th July 2004 03:52 | |
I see there's 25% off the price of EWQLSO Gold until tomorrow (and the rest of the stuff in their independence day sale)
http://www.soundsonline.com/ http://www.northernsounds.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=26 Also applies to upgrades Trouble is if you are in the UK you still end up paying another 25% on vat and duty | ||
| Rabid | Posted: 14th July 2004 08:23 | |
This is probably next on my "to buy" list. At the price I have to compare it to one of the Roland SRX orchestral ROM's. I'm guessing that for the size, GPO should sound much better. You would expect them to do a good job programming the sounds and not using massive amounts of samples as a crutch.
Can anyone compare GPO to the Roland SRX ROM’s? Robert | ||
| diego | Posted: 14th July 2004 08:46 | |
I like GPO but I don´t actually own it... |











