I don't know about the detection thing. My wife can detect ambient music, and she says it's noise.nBeat wrote:Hm...
Well, I seen some very broad definition here of what is music.
Consider speech then. It consists of rhythm, pitch, timbre and phrase.
Would that make the human speech music ?
When I talk in an ordinary situation, is my intent then to make music ?
Who would know the difference ?
What if I scribble down a few sentences and then decide to "perform"
the piece as music:
"Hello folks. Listen to this tune I wrote. ...and then I start ramling.
I mean, come on.
Argh, it's all in the ear of the receiver.
Without a receiver there's no detection.
And without detection there's no sign of intent.
Not too vague I hope.
A small rant.
-
- KVRAF
- 11839 posts since 23 Nov, 2004 from west of east
We escape the trap of our own subjectivity by
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
perceiving neither black nor white but shades of grey
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
Between this and your music theory post, I get the feeling you have a poor sense of the various shades of grey.the_nihilist wrote:stuff
-
- KVRAF
- 3057 posts since 9 Apr, 2003
what I can't get past is all the intermediate clutter
crickets I don't mind because they probably can't help having occurred
it's the wavicles and sub-wavicles that really crick my wicket
crickets I don't mind because they probably can't help having occurred
it's the wavicles and sub-wavicles that really crick my wicket
5 twelve
-
- KVRAF
- 3057 posts since 9 Apr, 2003
sound design ~= making the fabric
music ~= making the garment
music ~= making the garment
5 twelve
-
- KVRAF
- 3096 posts since 3 Nov, 2002 from Kettering UK
What are curtains and tablecloths then?havran wrote:sound design ~= making the fabric
music ~= making the garment
-
- Banned
- 851 posts since 14 Mar, 2004
Do some people prefer rant about music and audio than actually make music? You'd think so by half the threads here at KvR...
PS: Fabric, shmabric, blah blah blah, you're all full of shit.
PS: Fabric, shmabric, blah blah blah, you're all full of shit.
-
- KVRAF
- 5818 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
All classical music has been composed for specific instruments. Instrument=sound design has governed the compositional process until our days.shamann wrote:No they haven't. Sound design is closer in breed to instrument design, both at the building blocks of music, but most musicmaking processes have been unconcerned with instrument design.
No composer ever heard "notes", "harmonies" or any such things as such, they heard tones played by some instruments.
And terms invented to describe properties of western music tradition hardly define music.
Times have changed, music has changed. It will always be so.
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
Exploitation of timbre is not the same thing as sound design, which is the development of new timbres, and as such is still closer to instrument making than composition. They didn't invent a new violin every time they wrote a concerto. But sound design, as we know and use the term, does essentially that.
Irrelevant if times change, that fact does not erase the delineation between the two concepts. I have nothing against sound design or developing new compositional techniques based on the approach, but to say that composition has always been sound design is misleading.
Irrelevant if times change, that fact does not erase the delineation between the two concepts. I have nothing against sound design or developing new compositional techniques based on the approach, but to say that composition has always been sound design is misleading.
-
- KVRAF
- 5818 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
What was said that sound design has always been composition, not the other way around.
Composers did not exploit timbres, their work was predefined by the timbres of available instruments. No, the composer did not invent a new violin, but the maker of violin shaped the careers of a thousand composers, and every single violin concerto they ever "invented".
There is a fundamental difference between the compositional process for 4 violins and the compositional process for 4 laptops. This is what has changed, and it erases the delineation between the concepts.
We should not be restricted by definitions or descriptions of abstract concepts - there is no "music", neither is is defined by "structure" of "harmony" or "melody". There is only sound made by someone, to be received or rejected by someone else.
Composers did not exploit timbres, their work was predefined by the timbres of available instruments. No, the composer did not invent a new violin, but the maker of violin shaped the careers of a thousand composers, and every single violin concerto they ever "invented".
There is a fundamental difference between the compositional process for 4 violins and the compositional process for 4 laptops. This is what has changed, and it erases the delineation between the concepts.
We should not be restricted by definitions or descriptions of abstract concepts - there is no "music", neither is is defined by "structure" of "harmony" or "melody". There is only sound made by someone, to be received or rejected by someone else.
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
-
- KVRist
- 162 posts since 15 Apr, 2003 from new zealand
i think his name was Vermeer.nuffink wrote:And somebody mixed Vermeers paint. History, unaccountably, has forgotten his name.
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
somebody other than vermeer may have ground pigments and made his paint admittedly (although he was working at a time when many artists still ground their own pigments) ... but its a poor analogy anyway ...
... a painter would almost never seperate out the process of mixing colour (sound design) and composing an image (composition) ... the 2 are so inextricably linked as to be the same thing ...
... maybe its coming from exactly this kind of visual arts background that colours my ideas on music though ...
slainte rob
... a painter would almost never seperate out the process of mixing colour (sound design) and composing an image (composition) ... the 2 are so inextricably linked as to be the same thing ...
... maybe its coming from exactly this kind of visual arts background that colours my ideas on music though ...
slainte rob
-
- KVRAF
- 7400 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
But what about the production side of this? Recording onto the media you will use to distribute the song? (I suppose this would be equiv to mass producing the painting and selling it for 9.99 at Wal-Mart )pHz wrote:... a painter would almost never seperate out the process of mixing colour (sound design) and composing an image (composition) ... the 2 are so inextricably linked as to be the same thing ...