With all due respect but the "..mere approximation.." never referenced you or your software, what happened was that someone quoted you on the use of 0-delay on page 18, page 45 you took a dig at our marketing text and officially made it into the whole Saurus vs. Diva thing.Urs wrote: I'm only interested in how you come to the conclusion that our software is less accurately modeled than yours ("a mere approximation"), and badly optimised. Because this is what you say and this is where I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
Did we reference you inside this thread, yes we did, but only in reference to the "No worries. Many filters have been 0-delay for a long time, even MFM 1.0 had them, back in 2002....." quote.
Since when do you need an invitation to join in a competitors thread? you posted within half a day in this thread which at the time had nothing to do with Diva or any of your other products. Call it common courtesy, a multitude of companies here manage to stay out of each other's product threads yet somehow I see you or one of the people you work with slowly steer the conversation towards your products.Urs wrote: You put that out in the public, not me. Really, putting my name out there in the first place felt pretty much like an invitation, no?
