UVI launches UVX-3P - Roland JX-3P Emulation
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Ok - it is in the manual 32 presets
-
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 6 Mar, 2012
The answer is on UVI's product web site:
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
No, that doesn't clarify if they sampled the original factory presets.Skorpius wrote:The answer is on UVI's product web site:
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
Here is a run through the original:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9oJBTo5UHQ
Most of them sound completely awful
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Their is a couple of them I want to play, but I don't want to buy a £300 synthesizer to do so. A few of these presets were used on a very famous dance record from the 80's, Fat Fifth is one of them...Numanoid wrote:No, that doesn't clarify if they sampled the original factory presets.Skorpius wrote:The answer is on UVI's product web site:
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
Here is a run through the original:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9oJBTo5UHQ
Most of them sound completely awful
I just found I do not need an ilok dongle to use UVX-3p
It notes 32 factory presets included, I'm guessing that is all of them.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Here is a more comprehensive site with sound demos of each patch: http://www.synthmania.com/jx-3p.htmbreakmixer wrote: Their is a couple of them I want to play, but I don't want to buy a £300 synthesizer to do so. A few of these presets were used on a very famous dance record from the 80's, Fat Fifth is one of them...
It notes 32 factory presets included, I'm guessing that is all of them.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Thanks for that link - helps alot, btw apart from the Bassline(TB-303), most of the synth sounds on this track are JX-3p presets...Numanoid wrote:Here is a more comprehensive site with sound demos of each patch: http://www.synthmania.com/jx-3p.htmbreakmixer wrote: Their is a couple of them I want to play, but I don't want to buy a £300 synthesizer to do so. A few of these presets were used on a very famous dance record from the 80's, Fat Fifth is one of them...
It notes 32 factory presets included, I'm guessing that is all of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ5jTAISutM
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Yeah, could be, an awesome track that isbreakmixer wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ5jTAISutM
I've never thought about that bassline as 303, but yeah most def
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Not could be recieved this email today from someone involved with it(a later remake with the same sounds), deleted some of it as it is without permission...Numanoid wrote:Yeah, could be, an awesome track that isbreakmixer wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ5jTAISutM
I've never thought about that bassline as 303, but yeah most def
"Chris(Barbosa) is the original writer and producer.
Anyway, we used the original instruments. The majority of the synth parts were a Roland JX3P. Several were factory sounds. I think the two-note chord you're talking about is a patch called "Fat Fifth".
Last edited by breakmixer on Wed May 28, 2014 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Woops, whacky double postage!
-
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 6 Mar, 2012
Well, if a synth is fully restored to factory specifications, it does very well clarify that the original sounds have been sampled, because they were part of the factory specifications.Numanoid wrote: No, that doesn't clarify if they sampled the original factory presets.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Um, do you mean awful or awsome?Numanoid wrote:No, that doesn't clarify if they sampled the original factory presets.Skorpius wrote:The answer is on UVI's product web site:
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
Here is a run through the original:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9oJBTo5UHQ
Most of them sound completely awful
I think the JX-3P sounded funky and great, was like a two-osc version of the Juno in a way, using some identical components, and thus sounding better than the supposed successor, the JX-8P.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
I have now got it installed and it is not as straight up as just 'factory presets' as used on Shannon - Let The Music Play, found the string synth sound, Fat Fifth sounds different to the one on the vinyl(more than just effects added), as for the bell like metallic lead sound - it's nowhere to be found. Glad I didn't buy the real deal thinking I would have straight access to the sounds just to mess about a bit, most of these 'factory' sounds are quite basic and more or less achievable with other synths/hardware. Nice as a reference point though for reprogramming the sounds(and tweak to sound closer from there), haven't explored the complete soundset as was just primarily interested in the factory bank - nice authentic looking UI though!fluffy_little_something wrote:Um, do you mean awful or awsome?Numanoid wrote:No, that doesn't clarify if they sampled the original factory presets.Skorpius wrote:The answer is on UVI's product web site:
"A JX-3P was fully restored to factory spec, programmed by members of our sound design team and deeply multi-sampled, capturing samples both dry and with the built-in analog chorus enabled."
Here is a run through the original:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9oJBTo5UHQ
Most of them sound completely awful
I think the JX-3P sounded funky and great, was like a two-osc version of the Juno in a way, using some identical components, and thus sounding better than the supposed successor, the JX-8P.
Only paid $79.99 via JRR Shop, also didn't need an Ilok dongle as you can now use your PC to hold the license on.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Based on that video they sound awful, the presets that is, not the synth.fluffy_little_something wrote:Um, do you mean awful or awsome?
With just 32 presets available, it is a shame that the engineers had to put in presets for clavinets, organs, piano etc, but it seems every synth need to be geared toward covering the needs of the barroom pianist.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I think the Roland programmers did a good job back then, especially with the brass sounds... They would sound even better if one could hear the lower frequencies better, which are all but missing in the video.
The selection of the sounds, well, it was the early 80s
The basic sound is very pleasant, which is why I suggested TAL do an emulation of the JX-3P next, where they could reuse code from the U-NO-LX.
The selection of the sounds, well, it was the early 80s
The basic sound is very pleasant, which is why I suggested TAL do an emulation of the JX-3P next, where they could reuse code from the U-NO-LX.