KVR Audio

Numanoid · Post by **Numanoid** » Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:59 pm

thecontrolcentre wrote:so true

Talk about throwing stones in a glass house, was it just the other day we were having some "innocent" fun about a "nameless" synth, when the mighty Control Center barges in and tells us to stop it straight away: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=386829

Who was policing then?

thecontrolcentre · Post by **thecontrolcentre** » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:59 pm

Numeroid wrote:the mighty Control Center

Who,s that then ... the weakling numeroid's nemesis?

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 3:27 pm

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8QmFmn ... HE5RnRkOGc
Unlocked extra resonance on filter , scaled resonance knob. Adjustable oscillator bightness (was fixed)( 6 dbo lp filter). Adjustable filter cutoff limit (was fixed).
So i am planning to rewrite comepletly new plugin on c++.I hope i will do gui version in 2 months.

Mutant · Post by **Mutant** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 3:29 pm

Thanks

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:44 pm

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8QmFmn ... XZCbWlSUmc
Fixed that annoying red square bug. Error was in the gui trigonometry.

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:52 am

I am looking for the real Ob-x owners.I want to represent as much as possible in digital domain. Things im looking for : Transistor noise, filter behaviour at high frequencies with high resonance, additional obertones ( caused by some sort of overdrive).To analyse them i need .waw samples, because .mp3 wont fit due to spectrogram jitter.So any .waw samples would be nice,but static unmodulated sounds are better for analysis.
Basic C++ version coming in a month .

cosmosis · Post by **cosmosis** » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:37 pm

OK looks like someone left a bag of crack on the table again?

2DaT, don't let them get you down. Sounds like you're doing good. Sadly I can't test, as it would most likely make my laptop explode

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:59 pm

We can hear a bit of audio compression here, but overall sound palette of ob-xd
is observable.No efx!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXlPKKhk ... e=youtu.be

SODDI · Post by **SODDI** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:38 pm

Good luck. Some good advice here.

I would recommend that you get "OB-X", any and all Oberheim-identifiable/copyrightable markings off your product ASAP. "OhBeeEcks" doesn't have the same panache to it, but you never know when people are going to get lawsuit happy.

Numanoid · Post by **Numanoid** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:05 pm

2DaT wrote:I am looking for the real Ob-x owners.I want to represent as much as possible in digital domain. Things im looking for : Transistor noise, filter behaviour at high frequencies with high resonance, additional obertones ( caused by some sort of overdrive).

You mean, you haven't got access to the instrument you're trying to emulate?

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:14 pm

Video sounds v good.

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:32 pm

Numanoid wrote:
2DaT wrote:I am looking for the real Ob-x owners.I want to represent as much as possible in digital domain. Things im looking for : Transistor noise, filter behaviour at high frequencies with high resonance, additional obertones ( caused by some sort of overdrive).
You mean, you haven't got access to the instrument you're trying to emulate?

Yeah thats really sad , but wont stop me

Hardware is quite expensive thing for me.

2DaT · Post by **2DaT** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:35 pm

Less compression here (was really audible on fast attacks):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=purUIiKG0UA

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:41 pm

This thing sounds nice, good job.

Think i'll wait for your optimised version though, i guess it would slaughter my old PC to pieces CPU wise...

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:48 pm

2DaT wrote:Less compression here (was really audible on fast attacks):

That demo sounds good... nice job on the synth so far... when there is a Mac version I will be interested to try it!

Obxd synthesizer