I *think* the UI is usually open when this happens. (I haven't been scientific about it...)Urs wrote:Does it make any difference if Repro-1's UI is open or not?jbraner wrote:Here's another thing I'm noticing - and wondering if anyone else is seeing this.
Repro-1 (out now)
-
- KVRAF
- 1579 posts since 8 Jan, 2003 from Edinburgh
John Braner
http://johnbraner.bandcamp.com
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
and all the major streaming/download sites.
http://johnbraner.bandcamp.com
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
and all the major streaming/download sites.
-
- KVRAF
- 1579 posts since 8 Jan, 2003 from Edinburgh
Just to verify - I have "frozen" all 4 instances of Repro-1 and everything is OK with the file. I left it sitting for over an hour, and it's fine - no hanging, or "not responding".jbraner wrote:I *think* the UI is usually open when this happens. (I haven't been scientific about it...)Urs wrote:Does it make any difference if Repro-1's UI is open or not?jbraner wrote:Here's another thing I'm noticing - and wondering if anyone else is seeing this.
John Braner
http://johnbraner.bandcamp.com
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
and all the major streaming/download sites.
http://johnbraner.bandcamp.com
http://www.soundclick.com/johnbraner
and all the major streaming/download sites.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 20 Mar, 2001 from Zurich, Switzerland
Urs, do you guys have any plans to implement a poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
-
- KVRAF
- 3054 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
Please, don't go there...nicogrubert wrote:Urs, do you guys have any plans to implement a poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
Repro-1 will stay monophonic.
-
- KVRAF
- 2120 posts since 10 Apr, 2002 from Saint Germain en Laye, France
No, but the u-he team is working on a Pro5 emu :nicogrubert wrote:Urs, do you guys have any plans to implement a poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=475710&p=6654730&hi ... u#p6654730
-
- KVRer
- 3 posts since 1 Feb, 2016
Can someone please forward a link to any patches/presets? Thanks and Happy 2017!
-
- KVRAF
- 3054 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
http://www.u-he.com/PatchLib/ <--- bookmarkdopamine98 wrote:Can someone please forward a link to any patches/presets? Thanks and Happy 2017!
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 6 May, 2002
Thank God. I hope to see U-he Prophet 5.exmatproton wrote:Please, don't go there...nicogrubert wrote:Urs, do you guys have any plans to implement a poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
Repro-1 will stay monophonic.
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
-
- KVRist
- 253 posts since 18 Oct, 2008
Why not Prophet 10? Hell, give that thing as much voices as your CPU can take.electro wrote:Thank God. I hope to see U-he Prophet 5.exmatproton wrote:Please, don't go there...nicogrubert wrote:Urs, do you guys have any plans to implement a poly mode?
I know from some statements that the repro has features that cannot be used in poly mode but maybe its possible to disable all features when the repro plugin is in poly mode?
Repro-1 will stay monophonic.
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 28063 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
LOL, hehe, I don't see a contradiction in doing something that sounds like a Prophet 5 but has more voices. DX-7 had 16 voices and no-one got puzzled as to why it wasn't called DX-16
-
- KVRAF
- 15517 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
The Arp 2600 would have cost a fortune if that was actually a thing.Urs wrote:LOL, hehe, I don't see a contradiction in doing something that sounds like a Prophet 5 but has more voices. DX-7 had 16 voices and no-one got puzzled as to why it wasn't called DX-16
-
- KVRist
- 238 posts since 3 Apr, 2016
Yeah, the naming conventions were a bit silly back then.
The DX-7 has 16 voices and 6 operators, but somehow has a 7 in its name. The JX-3P and JX-8P have 6 voices, while the JX-10 has 12 etc.
However, I like those futuristic sounding cryptic synth names.
The DX-7 has 16 voices and 6 operators, but somehow has a 7 in its name. The JX-3P and JX-8P have 6 voices, while the JX-10 has 12 etc.
However, I like those futuristic sounding cryptic synth names.
-
- KVRist
- 238 posts since 3 Apr, 2016
The CS-5, CS-15, CS-15D, CS-30, CS-40 and so on have only one voice, though 
The names don't mean all that much, they just sound cool.
The names don't mean all that much, they just sound cool.
