Aside from updates and samples, i cant think of a synth they have done for years. Dave is always posting stuff about new (vintage) synths and studio clearouts etc, but never any hint about a new (non sampled) synth. Maybe they are too busy enjoying the real thing...wagtunes wrote:I only suggested Arturia because they already have an SEM. Sure, I'd like Gforce to make it. I doubt they will though. Otherwise, why haven't they already?tehlord wrote:Video by Gforce, who make arguably some of the best analogue emulations out there.
But you want Arturia to make it, who make some of the worst?
Cool.
I Want Arturia To Make This
- Banned
- 10732 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
- KVRAF
- 35249 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
If the host does multicore efficiently isn't it possible it would use less than one instance with 8 voices?whyterabbyt wrote:Its not a given; I reckon it would be pretty dependent on the plugin (or more specifically the level and type of optimisations the developer had done) as to whether 8 monophonic instances used significantly more CPU than a single 8-voice-polyphonic instance where each voice was 'properly' independent of the others (rather than just being an instance of the same patch.)wagtunes wrote:I understand. But in my DAW, that means 8 different tracks which certainly has to take up more CPU than having it all built into one track.whyterabbyt wrote:Technically, a 'true' 8-voice is stacking 8 instances, of the hardware.wagtunes wrote:The SEM, as it is right now, can't sound like that not without, as you said, stacking 8 instances of the plugin. Not the most ideal solution.
That's why I'd like a "true" Oberheim 8 voice.
Yes, no?
But at the end of the day, if its the difference between wanting a thing, and either getting a less efficient version of that thing or not getting it, then...