KVR Audio

wagtunes · Post by **wagtunes** » Wed Feb 07, 2018 4:54 pm

thecontrolcentre wrote:
wagtunes wrote:
I come off all cocky when I'm really just a nobody.
I get very defensive.
I get annoyed very easily when software doesn't work right.
Poor purchasing experiences drive me crazy.
I always look for excuses not to do something because I'm lazy.
I can't work with others at all.

.
You could use that in a rap ...

Yeah, but I hate rap.

thecontrolcentre · Post by **thecontrolcentre** » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:56 pm

InsertNameHere · Post by **InsertNameHere** » Mon May 28, 2018 8:09 am

Please forgive, but is there any reason to use Repro-1 now that Repro-5 is released, even for mono synths? I know Repro-1 is mono, and Repro-5 is polyphonic, but was curious if the sound of a monophonic lead in Repro-1 sounds the same in Repro-5?

fluffy_little_something · Mon May 28, 2018 8:29 am

The FX are different.

Hanz Meyzer · Post by **Hanz Meyzer** » Mon May 28, 2018 8:33 am

Hello Urs and Co,

is it possible that you add multiple outputs for routing the dsp into it, e.g. reverb and delay?

Also a pre-fx-panning would be helpful to separate fx from dry signal for mixing purposes (this would be obsolete of course if there were multi outs available).

Thanks for consideration.

Acid Mitch · Post by **Acid Mitch** » Mon May 28, 2018 8:41 am

InsertNameHere wrote:Please forgive, but is there any reason to use Repro-1 now that Repro-5 is released, even for mono synths? I know Repro-1 is mono, and Repro-5 is polyphonic, but was curious if the sound of a monophonic lead in Repro-1 sounds the same in Repro-5?

They sound different. That’s why you get two different synths and not just a polyphonic Pro1.
There may be some middle ground but besides the obvious stuff like polyphony, unison and the sequencer, parameter ranges, osc shapes and some other stuff are different.

braj · Post by **braj** » Mon May 28, 2018 9:17 am

FWIW I also use Repro-1 when I know I just want mono and want to restrain the CPU use. It also is more aimed at lead and bass, and has the sequencer and different effects. They definitely sound related, but they aren't the same, both are wonderful.

fluffy_little_something · Mon May 28, 2018 12:09 pm

Acid Mitch wrote:
InsertNameHere wrote:Please forgive, but is there any reason to use Repro-1 now that Repro-5 is released, even for mono synths? I know Repro-1 is mono, and Repro-5 is polyphonic, but was curious if the sound of a monophonic lead in Repro-1 sounds the same in Repro-5?
They sound different. That’s why you get two different synths and not just a polyphonic Pro1.
There may be some middle ground but besides the obvious stuff like polyphony, unison and the sequencer, parameter ranges, osc shapes and some other stuff are different.

One can, however, change some of those settings on the under the hood page or whatever it is called, i.e. Repro 5 properties in Repro 1, or the other way round, don't remember.

Mushy Mushy · Post by **Mushy Mushy** » Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:01 pm

Not sure if there's another, newer thread but anyway...

Is there a way to generate (or simulate) a random LFO in Repro1? I'd like to assign a random LFO to the filter cutoff. Possible?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:10 pm

Mushy Mushy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:01 pm Not sure if there's another, newer thread but anyway...

Is there a way to generate (or simulate) a random LFO in Repro1? I'd like to assign a random LFO to the filter cutoff. Possible?

Stretching my knowledge: The recent beta/RC of Repro 1.1.1 has Hive-style modifiers for the ModMatrix. If you use a fast looping AR Envelope (in JAWs) as source and LFO as source for Sample & Hold (right-click) you pretty much get a random S&H LFO. Use right-click and slew to taste.

Mushy Mushy · Post by **Mushy Mushy** » Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:13 pm

Urs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:10 pm
Mushy Mushy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:01 pm Not sure if there's another, newer thread but anyway...

Is there a way to generate (or simulate) a random LFO in Repro1? I'd like to assign a random LFO to the filter cutoff. Possible?
Stretching my knowledge: The recent beta/RC of Repro 1.1.1 has Hive-style modifiers for the ModMatrix. If you use a fast looping AR Envelope (in JAWs) as source and LFO as source for Sample & Hold (right-click) you pretty much get a random S&H LFO. Use right-click and slew to taste.

Now that's (prompt) service

Trying it out now

Thanks!

electro · Post by **electro** » Mon Dec 23, 2019 12:10 am

These is a new Repro beta?

maniacoli · Post by **maniacoli** » Mon Dec 23, 2019 12:57 pm

@electro : look here, i searched for them too ^^
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=536566

Howard · Post by **Howard** » Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:04 am

Mushy Mushy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:01 pm Not sure if there's another, newer thread but anyway...
Is there a way to generate (or simulate) a random LFO in Repro1? I'd like to assign a random LFO to the filter cutoff. Possible?

Yes. For recent beta of Repro-1 only…
* Use "LFO" (triangle) as your modulation source and set "Phase" (should actually read "Clock Phase") as the S&H trigger.
* Rectify "full wave+".
* Don't switch on the sequencer (!), but adjust CLOCK and LFO rates until you find a quasi-random sweet spot.

Mushy Mushy · Post by **Mushy Mushy** » Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:08 am

Howard wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:04 am
Mushy Mushy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:01 pm Not sure if there's another, newer thread but anyway...
Is there a way to generate (or simulate) a random LFO in Repro1? I'd like to assign a random LFO to the filter cutoff. Possible?
Yes. For recent beta of Repro-1 only…
* Use "LFO" (triangle) as your modulation source and set "Phase" (should actually read "Clock Phase") as the S&H trigger.
* Rectify "full wave+".
* Don't switch on the sequencer (!), but adjust CLOCK and LFO rates until you find a quasi-random sweet spot.

Awesome, thanks man. Will try tonight

u-he Repro (Repro-1 & Repro-5) released