It already is an open modular framework, unlike Softube Modular and has progressed 100 times faster.JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Enough with the vintage emulations! Bring on the digital!
- KVRAF
- 9576 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Amazon: why not use an alternative
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Except it's not in VST form. At least not for Windows unless I'm missing something.VariKusBrainZ wrote:It already is an open modular framework, unlike Softube Modular and has progressed 100 times faster.JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 28 Feb, 2015
Besides the official VST bridge developed by the VCV Rack developer, there is another project where a guy has compiled the VCV Rack to a VST plugin, but as far as I know everytime a rack module gets updated (or added), the whole VCV Rack VST plugin needs to be re-compiled. So running paid modules is not an option in the VST plugin version.wagtunes wrote:Except it's not in VST form. At least not for Windows unless I'm missing something.VariKusBrainZ wrote:It already is an open modular framework, unlike Softube Modular and has progressed 100 times faster.JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
i9-10900K | 128GB DDR4 | RTX 3090 | Arturia AudioFuse/KeyLab mkII/SparkLE | PreSonus ATOM/ATOM SQ | Studio One | Reason | Bitwig Studio | Reaper | Renoise | FL Studio | ~900 VSTs | 300+ REs
- KVRAF
- 1571 posts since 19 May, 2011 from North Carolina
Hence my thinking that it's close to what a lot of us want, just not quite there yet. I'm thinking of toying with it anyway; it's just a bit of a workflow issue - but no different than working with a hardware modular in that sense, and a lot cheaper!starflakeprj wrote:Besides the official VST bridge developed by the VCV Rack developer, there is another project where a guy has compiled the VCV Rack to a VST plugin, but as far as I know everytime a rack module gets updated (or added), the whole VCV Rack VST plugin needs to be re-compiled. So running paid modules is not an option in the VST plugin version.wagtunes wrote:Except it's not in VST form. At least not for Windows unless I'm missing something.VariKusBrainZ wrote:It already is an open modular framework, unlike Softube Modular and has progressed 100 times faster.JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Plus I've probably got a lifetime of playing with Reaktor blocks until I'm bored, and there's stuff like this beast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnpvmEkvWKo
- KVRAF
- 21196 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
That thing is a black hole by itself. Don't let it suck you in.JoeCat wrote:Hence my thinking that it's close to what a lot of us want, just not quite there yet. I'm thinking of toying with it anyway; it's just a bit of a workflow issue - but no different than working with a hardware modular in that sense, and a lot cheaper!starflakeprj wrote:Besides the official VST bridge developed by the VCV Rack developer, there is another project where a guy has compiled the VCV Rack to a VST plugin, but as far as I know everytime a rack module gets updated (or added), the whole VCV Rack VST plugin needs to be re-compiled. So running paid modules is not an option in the VST plugin version.wagtunes wrote:Except it's not in VST form. At least not for Windows unless I'm missing something.VariKusBrainZ wrote:It already is an open modular framework, unlike Softube Modular and has progressed 100 times faster.JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Plus I've probably got a lifetime of playing with Reaktor blocks until I'm bored, and there's stuff like this beast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnpvmEkvWKo
- KVRAF
- 6980 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
The keyword is „OPEN“.VariKusBrainZ wrote:Nowagtunes wrote:Isn't that what Softube was supposed to be?JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Softube is closed and expensive as hell compared with VCV or Blocks.
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
- KVRAF
- 11093 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Softube had what seemed to be a great idea, but killed it with their greedy prices, and lack of support (eg, more than a year to implement a proper patch storage system and browser). Modular is death, IMO.martinjuenke wrote:The keyword is „OPEN“.VariKusBrainZ wrote:Nowagtunes wrote:Isn't that what Softube was supposed to be?JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Softube is closed and expensive as hell compared with VCV or Blocks.
VCV as a VST is (still) not an option, but I hope they get there. Anyway, as a platform, it is great, and I hope they succeed.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14985 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Agreed. Sadly, as high quality as their software is, I gave up on Softube a while ago after briefly owning their guitar amp simulators. Frankly there were options that sounded as good and were loaded up with a lot of professional features, where their amp sims were bare bones and clunky to use. I remember finding it hard to get a decent amount of gain out of them and the company's answer to me was, "yeah, well adjust everything else in your mix." When Softube Modular came out, I was interested until I read about what the business model was. It also didn't sound any better than Reaktor, and Reaktor already had a lot more modules made for it and NI was even adding new ones for free. Also, NI gave you the option to run Reaktor at different sample rates, so you could run a complex patch that didn't have any audio rate modulation going on at 48 khz to save CPU cycles. Modular had no quality settings at all.fmr wrote:Softube had what seemed to be a great idea, but killed it with their greedy prices, and lack of support (eg, more than a year to implement a proper patch storage system and browser). Modular is death, IMO.martinjuenke wrote:The keyword is „OPEN“.VariKusBrainZ wrote:Nowagtunes wrote:Isn't that what Softube was supposed to be?JoeCat wrote:What I can't wait for (and where almost there with VCV Rack https://vcvrack.com/) is an open modular framework like Eurorack in VST form. Once they get that working and supported by more devs...
Softube is closed and expensive as hell compared with VCV or Blocks.
VCV as a VST is (still) not an option, but I hope they get there. Anyway, as a platform, it is great, and I hope they succeed.
VCV is a little clunky to use, but IMO, I think it's going to really be the thing that Softube thought their Modular would be.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRist
- 357 posts since 21 May, 2018
yellowmix wrote:What do you think of Waverazor? It's the newest commercially available synthesis method that isn't physical modelling. The editing pages are understandably complex and there's a lot yet to be discovered. And yet I hardly see it mentioned. But then again, people are initially perplexed with Bazille, FM, and at the beginning even subtractive has a learning curve. Many people use presets only as well.wagtunes wrote:Personally, I have no use for any more emulations, analog OR digital. Right now I can make any sound that's ever been created in synth history. I want a synth that can make NEW sounds. Sounds we've never heard before.
Until THAT synth comes out, I'm done buying synths.
Do you think new sounds will inherently require more complex understanding for sound design? Considering every advance in every other field requires an understanding of all previous thought, discoveries, etc. before it, in order to build upon it. This is a concern because people want quick and easy workflows. So why would a developer gamble it all on pushing the envelope?
I would say that Techtronic's Biotek 2 has a much more unique sound as a synth more then Waverazor.
Seems like we really only need 5 synths at the most anyways.
-------------------
Bitwig is my DAWs and UHe and Tracktion Synths are my Bae. I maybe buy one synth a year. REMEMBER SELF just one synth a year!
Bitwig is my DAWs and UHe and Tracktion Synths are my Bae. I maybe buy one synth a year. REMEMBER SELF just one synth a year!
-
- KVRAF
- 7745 posts since 15 Sep, 2005 from East Coast of the USA
I think Arturia's emulation is the only one, unless I am mistaken.V0RT3X wrote:I've said this before, even dedicated a entire thread to it.
Where is a super accurate emulation of the Prophet VS??
I wish Togu Audio Line would take it on.
-
- KVRian
- 1286 posts since 25 Jul, 2009
Yes - that one appears to be a beast.JoeCat wrote:....
Plus I've probably got a lifetime of playing with Reaktor blocks until I'm bored, and there's stuff like this beast:
....
Took a look at it, but it'll take some digging in to get my head around it.
Thanks for the heads up.
-
- KVRAF
- 10260 posts since 19 Feb, 2004 from Paris
It's curious how a thread originally labelled as 'enough with the vintage emulations, bring on the digital' suddenly turns into talking about mostly analogue modular enivronments, wich were among the first vintage monsters to appear
Overall, I think analog, as well as 'digital', are -slowly- evolving. Fact is that, from a pure synthesis POV, very few revolutionnay methods have seen the light since ages. It's -almost- all there for many years.
So finally, the current modular rebirth trend might not be a total derailing of the thread, as indeed you can mix old analog and pure digital things in a modular.
Overall, I think analog, as well as 'digital', are -slowly- evolving. Fact is that, from a pure synthesis POV, very few revolutionnay methods have seen the light since ages. It's -almost- all there for many years.
So finally, the current modular rebirth trend might not be a total derailing of the thread, as indeed you can mix old analog and pure digital things in a modular.
http://www.lelotusbleu.fr Synth Presets
77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there
77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there
-
- KVRist
- 357 posts since 21 May, 2018
I think Waverazor is absolutely original tech with its oscillator. Cutting up a single sine wave is addicting in that instrument..
-------------------
Bitwig is my DAWs and UHe and Tracktion Synths are my Bae. I maybe buy one synth a year. REMEMBER SELF just one synth a year!
Bitwig is my DAWs and UHe and Tracktion Synths are my Bae. I maybe buy one synth a year. REMEMBER SELF just one synth a year!