I'm not sure what my stance on those threads was. I do know that I've been proven wrong before but my current take is that my DX200 seems to have a bit more... "body" than FM8, but I don't think FM8 is the best sounding plug-in FM synth either. I'd put Octopus and Toxic Biohazard over it in a heartbeat. FM8... like most NI products tends to sound a bit... perfect and plasticy? Even Massive, when it's set up to be as gnarly as hell, seems to have this quality. I'm not saying NI stuff is bad, it just has that... NI sound. Yamaha hardware seems to have a more imperfect and interesting character to me. Could totally be my imagination though. I do remember Livingsounds (I think) posted some a/b where the difference was pretty obvious. One thing that's great about FM8 is it's interface. If you could use it to directly program a DX... that would be awesome.ghettosynth wrote:Ok, thanks for the response. The high frequency transient I can potentially see, but I'm trying to understand what would hamper the dynamics of software, per se. But, I'll put them side by side. I really like FM synths, but, I've never really used them for more classic sounds, other than to noodle about.Gonga wrote:Exactly right on the JV.ghettosynth wrote:In some way I can see his point, plugins don't do the bread and butter rompler thing all that well and certainly if you're trying to replace a specific rompler with a software version of it such that it is compatible with all the sounds.zerocrossing wrote:You're kidding right?Gonga wrote: The only synths I've kept are two rack-mount units that cannot (yet) be found in a quality vst: Roland JV-2080...
But this:What? What does it do that FM8 doesn't do? Be specific because I have one and I want to compare them side by side. I would say that the TX-802 is a synth that I regret NOT selling when it still had some value.Yamaha TX-802 FM synth
The TX-802 has dynamic balls that FM8 does not have. It also can do an awesome high-frequency transient that FM8 cannot. The Jazz Guitar patch (one of Jan Hammer's staples) cannot be done well in any current vst.
If you can think of any other bog standard patches that really highlight the difference that would be great. I'll side by side, at least, the TX802, the SY77, FM8, and the Nord G1. BTW: If you don't know, the G1 and G2 both have a six voice sine wave oscillator bank specifically built for doing FM sounds. I believe that internally they had written a patch converter but I'm not sure that they ever released it.
Several have been written by others, including this one:
https://github.com/msg/g2ools
There are quite a few discussions about this, not everyone agrees that you can't replace a DX with either FM8 or the Nord G1, but, then again, there's often a lot of misinformation in these threads, both at the other site and here. A gem in this thread is that both the M12 and P5 have CEM chips but they don't sound the same, indeed! Don't get me wrong, the antecedent is true, but it's a bit like saying both corvettes and chevettes have chevy engines, but they don't drive the same. At any rate, on to the links:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/electron ... -fm-2.html
I wish that the TX802 vs FM8 audio comparisons were still up, people were surprised that they thought that the hardware sounded better but it turned out to be the software.
Some more discussions, zerocrossing is all over these
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/electron ... tions.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/electron ... dware.html
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/electron ... ality.html
I'm not sure whether I regret not selling the SY77. I picked it up super cheap so that I could use micro tuning to pretend to be Richard D. James, but I haven't been able to cure some sticky keyboard issues and so it's been in the closet forever. I even purchased a new display for it. I guess it's coming out of the closet today, heh!
Of course, I got the DX200 mostly because it had knobs, which we all know are FUN.