July Madness discount - which plugins would you like to include?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
MAutoVolume will be on sale .
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
My pleasure
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Please do NOT use PMs, but mail me to info@meldaproduction.com
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Thank you!
And yes, you should get all of it!!
And yes, you should get all of it!!
-
- KVRAF
- 1811 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
MRhythmizer too please I know I am late !!!
Mac Studio
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
- KVRer
- 26 posts since 7 Dec, 2008
Great news about MAutoVolume in the July offer I've recently purchased the MCreativeBundle and am very impressed with the quality of the plugins.
-
- KVRian
- 656 posts since 25 Sep, 2010
I think one of the unsung gems in the Melda catalog is MDynamics. It's on par with any popular full-featured compressor such as Pro-C, but doesn't get a lot of mention here in kvr-land. Maybe a sale would garner it some well-deserved attention.
But if you really want to generate some buzz, put the free bundle upgrade on sale. I think it would appeal to the cheap crowd upstairs and probably spur some chatter in the Effects forum. That in turn would spread the word about the free bundle and drive new eyeballs to your site - incredibly, I still talk to people who don't know about Meldaproduction yet.
But if you really want to generate some buzz, put the free bundle upgrade on sale. I think it would appeal to the cheap crowd upstairs and probably spur some chatter in the Effects forum. That in turn would spread the word about the free bundle and drive new eyeballs to your site - incredibly, I still talk to people who don't know about Meldaproduction yet.
- KVRAF
- 5479 posts since 15 Dec, 2011 from Bucharest, Romania
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Hi folks, both MMultiAnalyzer and the free bundle WILL be on sale
- KVRAF
- 5479 posts since 15 Dec, 2011 from Bucharest, Romania
Great. I also like 3 plugins from that one (MOscillator, MComb and MTuner).MeldaProduction wrote:...and the free bundle WILL be on sale
- KVRAF
- 5479 posts since 15 Dec, 2011 from Bucharest, Romania
Sorry for the noob question asked in the wrong place, but I'm just discovering Melda products now.
Strictly for automatic eq (matching commercial tracks curves) which product gives better results? MAutoDynamicEq or MAutoEqualizer?
I noticed that one has 7 bands and the other 10. In my tests they both find the same curves for source and target tracks, but apply a different final curve ('to sound like') even with the same number of bands (7). Why?
Thanx.
Strictly for automatic eq (matching commercial tracks curves) which product gives better results? MAutoDynamicEq or MAutoEqualizer?
I noticed that one has 7 bands and the other 10. In my tests they both find the same curves for source and target tracks, but apply a different final curve ('to sound like') even with the same number of bands (7). Why?
Thanx.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14019 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
MAutoEqualizer has the advantage of having the linear-phase version. It also has different filters, MAutoDynamicEq has the newest ones (adjustable slope technology) and also is dynamic. Personally I'd suggest going for MAutoDynamicEq, unless you don't need LP processing. Both produce different results simply because they have different filters.