KVR Audio

Glooper · Post by **Glooper** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:25 pm

I did this a while a go now.. But revisited over the last week. trying out some new drums on there using RMX. So thought I'd post it again to get some feedback on me the new mix.

http://www.phunkynutts.com/music/Gloope ... -%2010.mp3

THinking the drums are too loud now though..

Ben

edit: removed the last version as I was hogging two spots in a row on the KVR music thang..

runagate · Post by **runagate** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:41 pm

You're not concerned with the backing track, are you?
The only thing I'd recommend there is that the mix is so spare and open you may want to use some tube saturation on it.

For Ms. Streisand, though, I have no recommendation.

Glooper · Post by **Glooper** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:07 pm

runagate wrote:You're not concerned with the backing track, are you?

Ay? Of course I am? it was the drums I've mainly been working on

runagate wrote: The only thing I'd recommend there is that the mix is so spare and open you may want to use some tube saturation on it.

Already got some slight compression on the master bus... Will try and dig out some tube saturation... though I don't think I have any nice natural tube saturatorerers

runagate wrote: For Ms. Streisand, though, I have no recommendation.

Ms Streisand... hmm.. don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing!

CypherOne · Post by **CypherOne** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:15 pm

RMX has a good tube saturation effect I think....

sorry I'm at work so I can't listen to this yet, just thought I'd chip for the sake of it

MotorMind · Post by **MotorMind** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:19 pm

Glooper wrote:I did this a while a go now.. But revisited over the last week. trying out some new drums on there using RMX. So thought I'd post it again to get some feedback on me the new mix.

http://www.phunkynutts.com/music/Gloope ... 0-%209.mp3

Still doesn't sound as good as I think it should.. but run out of ideas no how to improve it!

Try by changing the spelling to "beautiful".

runagate · Post by **runagate** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:19 pm

I dunno, Gloop, it sounds good to me.

If you're going for "open" and "clean" sounding it sounds great.

If you're trying to dirty it up well, that's harder than cleaning.

Glooper · Post by **Glooper** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:26 pm

MotorMind wrote:
Glooper wrote:I did this a while a go now.. But revisited over the last week. trying out some new drums on there using RMX. So thought I'd post it again to get some feedback on me the new mix.

http://www.phunkynutts.com/music/Gloope ... 0-%209.mp3

Still doesn't sound as good as I think it should.. but run out of ideas no how to improve it!
Try by changing the spelling to "beautiful".

Fixed! \o/

Glooper · Post by **Glooper** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:30 pm

runagate wrote:I dunno, Gloop, it sounds good to me.

If you're going for "open" and "clean" sounding it sounds great.

If you're trying to dirty it up well, that's harder than cleaning.

Well thats good..

Not sure whether I'm going for dirty or clean really!.. probably more to the dirty yet warm side than the clean and cold..

Ben

runagate · Post by **runagate** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:32 pm

Send it on over to me and I'll make it warm real quick.

Glooper · Post by **Glooper** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:34 pm

CypherOne wrote:RMX has a good tube saturation effect I think....

sorry I'm at work so I can't listen to this yet, just thought I'd chip for the sake of it

It does.. but can't see how you can use the RMX effects outside of RMX to apply the saturation on the whole mix? :S

Ben

YUGA · Post by **YUGA** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:09 pm

Nice work!

Yeah it's exceptionally clean and open as a trip hop tune. but if the mix is more dirty or muddy, it may sound too Potisheadish.

icelizarrd · Post by **icelizarrd** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:07 pm

This is awesome. I was a little skeptical at the beginning, but the guitar and singer really make this piece. Nice drums too.

I want a dirtier vibraphone. Or a more realistic one, whichever. It just feels too dry and digital. Maybe just a touch more reverb would help that out.

Yeah... the vibraphone's about the only thing really detracting from my enjoyment of the piece. But it's awesome aside from that!

runagate · Post by **runagate** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:37 pm

Here ya go... I used:

TubeLimit
Satoo
PhatBuzzFree
6-BC 6 Band Compressor

So Very Beautiful to me Dirty Mix

even7 · Post by **even7** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:46 pm

i love this. bravos.

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:20 pm

runagate wrote:Here ya go... I used:

TubeLimit
Satoo
PhatBuzzFree
6-BC 6 Band Compressor
So Very Beautiful to me Dirty Mix

well ... if were playing ...

... just for shits and giggles ben ... eqium ... trash ... GUP-1 ... 4front auxiter ... ozone3 ... heading off towards portishead / death in vegas territory ...

(more for overall vibe than anything else ... doing it on the whole (converted .mp3) mix rather than having the individual tracks to work on it has to be that way)

http://experimentfour.brinkster.net/aud ... sedmix.mp3

slainte

rob

Glooper - So very beautiful - Trip hop