Rozzer wrote:wicked asinine
CypherOne - DiscoShit (removed for now)
-
- KVRAF
- 4960 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from UK
-
- KVRian
- 1120 posts since 4 Jun, 2003 from Skanky Manc
great name for a band!Glassback wrote:Rozzer wrote:wicked asinine
-
- KVRAF
- 4960 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from UK
-
- KVRAF
- 2106 posts since 31 Dec, 2002 from London, UK
Late to the party as usual. I've only heard the clips Topaz posted. While I think a key/chord/whatever change is good it also comes across as lacking a bit of creativity. If something else happens ALONG with the chord change, yes that's cool, but if it only happens as Topaz showed that just seems a bit unimaginative to me.
When I hear I track that does that (it's common in Goa trance) I think it's just an excuse to have the same music going for another minute or 2. (No offence on Topaz, I know he was just making a point).
BUT if you at the same time eg. remove the kick or the 303 and add a string then it's cool. So in short, I'd rather have the music changing overall than just the chord. Having both is even better though.
Just my tuppence.
When I hear I track that does that (it's common in Goa trance) I think it's just an excuse to have the same music going for another minute or 2. (No offence on Topaz, I know he was just making a point).
BUT if you at the same time eg. remove the kick or the 303 and add a string then it's cool. So in short, I'd rather have the music changing overall than just the chord. Having both is even better though.
Just my tuppence.
-
- KVRAF
- 4618 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
how could I possibly add anything ?
I only had the mp3 and simply pitch shifted the whole section about to show what I meant.
of course a new sound or lead line would lift it even more, adding these simple changes opens the track wide open for such things.
I only had the mp3 and simply pitch shifted the whole section about to show what I meant.
of course a new sound or lead line would lift it even more, adding these simple changes opens the track wide open for such things.
Armadillo wrote:Late to the party as usual. I've only heard the clips Topaz posted. While I think a key/chord/whatever change is good it also comes across as lacking a bit of creativity.
-
- KVRAF
- 2106 posts since 31 Dec, 2002 from London, UK
Aaaargh.....I tried to make it clear but it still got misunderstood.
I wasn't talking about your "version" of the track. I was talking about chord changes in general and giving Cypher One some ideas and just giving my general opinion regarding the subject.
I wasn't talking about your "version" of the track. I was talking about chord changes in general and giving Cypher One some ideas and just giving my general opinion regarding the subject.
-
- KVRAF
- 4960 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from UK
Me too.Kriminal wrote:I was just thinking thatCypherOne wrote:well this is cool, 3 pages about no tune...
On the other hand, OUR tune that we spent so long on, gets pretty much ignored.
What a weird old place this is.
-
- KVRAF
- 4960 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from UK
I might have to try that myself.
I'm getting some inspiration now - hang on it's gone again.
Finished.
Should have it posted sometime later.
I'm getting some inspiration now - hang on it's gone again.
Finished.
Should have it posted sometime later.
-
- KVRAF
- 4618 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
it wasn't a "version" of the track,
just an example of common progressions.
I just listened to your big beat tracks, very good stuff indeed great production man
but does exactly the same thing, all based around one root note.
bottom line is there are tons of tracks that do this
and there is nothing wrong with that of course, it was just my opinion.
just an example of common progressions.
I just listened to your big beat tracks, very good stuff indeed great production man
but does exactly the same thing, all based around one root note.
bottom line is there are tons of tracks that do this
and there is nothing wrong with that of course, it was just my opinion.
Armadillo wrote:I wasn't talking about your "version" of the track.
