This is the first time i post a track here. Please, take a listen. It's a progressive 6/4 breakz track. Hope, you'll like it. I'll leave it for some days on the server.
Any feedback welcome!
Download the track here!
breakz track
-
- KVRist
- 264 posts since 28 Jan, 2003
nice. The time signature seemed a bit jarring at first but it soon settles into a groove and works really well (sometimes breaks style tunes in non 4/4 time have me thinking "where exactly does each bar start?", but not with this tune).
Arrangement is great - transitions between different sections are fluid, and everything seamlessly fits together to form a consistent whole even though there's a lot of variety between different sections.
Personally I'd to hear more melodic variety, but that's more a reflection of my opinion of the genre rather than a criticism of this particulr tune.
Quality of production is awesome - what software do you produce with?
Arrangement is great - transitions between different sections are fluid, and everything seamlessly fits together to form a consistent whole even though there's a lot of variety between different sections.
Personally I'd to hear more melodic variety, but that's more a reflection of my opinion of the genre rather than a criticism of this particulr tune.
Quality of production is awesome - what software do you produce with?
-
- KVRAF
- 7936 posts since 18 Feb, 2003 from out there somewhere
nice track. Good beats, needs a bassline though! I liked the transitions and stupidly wouldn't have really noticed the odd time signature. Personally think you could have made the track half the length as I got a bit bored halfway through. Nice atmosphere, good stuff overall 
-
- KVRian
- 1167 posts since 4 Sep, 2003
Great way yo make an entrance into the cafe, eh ?
LOL
Lovely track and production, but a Chris says, could do with a little melody and Cypher points out there's a whole where a fat bass could fit...
Very nice though
LOL
Lovely track and production, but a Chris says, could do with a little melody and Cypher points out there's a whole where a fat bass could fit...
Very nice though
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 448 posts since 23 Sep, 2003 from Hungary
Thanks for all the feedback.
Well... i'm not that fat bass guy...
the length of the track could be around 3 minutes less if i would not make it DJ friendly. Because now the intro and the ending are compatible with other time signatures (with 2/4, wich is compatible with 4/4, but there's also an ending before the 2/4 ending, in 6/4... so i needed time to arrange this signatures and prepare the DJ and leave him enough time that a new signature will come in soon... (unlike in the Terminal Head - Weekend warrior Bedrock mix, where the time signature just changes 3 times in 5 minutes)
I'm glad you like it!
The whole thing was done on a 2.1 MHz Dothan laptop with the built in soundcard (sounds like shit) and an AKG K240 headphone.
Well... i'm not that fat bass guy...
the length of the track could be around 3 minutes less if i would not make it DJ friendly. Because now the intro and the ending are compatible with other time signatures (with 2/4, wich is compatible with 4/4, but there's also an ending before the 2/4 ending, in 6/4... so i needed time to arrange this signatures and prepare the DJ and leave him enough time that a new signature will come in soon... (unlike in the Terminal Head - Weekend warrior Bedrock mix, where the time signature just changes 3 times in 5 minutes)I'm glad you like it!
The whole thing was done on a 2.1 MHz Dothan laptop with the built in soundcard (sounds like shit) and an AKG K240 headphone.
-
- KVRAF
- 7936 posts since 18 Feb, 2003 from out there somewhere
just a little bump for this track. I've had this sat on my hard drive for weeks, wasn't sure whether to keep it or not, then I listened to it several times yesterday and again this morning. It's definitely a keeper, nice moody breaks and a great building atmosphere (it's still too long tho...
)
)-
- KVRian
- 1120 posts since 4 Jun, 2003 from Skanky Manc
cool track
definately missing some low frequencies though. Possibly because you mix on headphones.
Would work well in a mix i think.
definately missing some low frequencies though. Possibly because you mix on headphones.
Would work well in a mix i think.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 448 posts since 23 Sep, 2003 from Hungary
-
- KVRian
- 781 posts since 26 Feb, 2004 from UK
Great tune mate, what sequencer/vst's are you using ? 
