New Mac Mini versus early 2011 13" MBP? Performance improvement?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 511 posts since 15 Dec, 2012 from Waunakee, Wiscompton
I have a 4 year old 13" MacBook Pro and I'd like to upgrade to something new to get more storage (my 320 Gb drive is almost full) and more performance (more VST's!), but the new Retina MBP's aren't very affordable, especially if one ups the drive storage to a reasonable amount.
How are Mac Mini's as budget production-only computers? I'm looking at the mid-range $600-ish model and am wondering how it performs versus what I currently have. Are there any performance indexes out there comparing new versus old Macs?
How are Mac Mini's as budget production-only computers? I'm looking at the mid-range $600-ish model and am wondering how it performs versus what I currently have. Are there any performance indexes out there comparing new versus old Macs?
- KVRAF
- 5805 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
http://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks#4
This would be the Mac Mini you are considering to buy:
-Mac mini (Late 2014)
Intel Core i5-4278U 2600 MHz (2 cores)
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 6590
This would be the Mac Mini you are considering to buy:
-Mac mini (Late 2014)
Intel Core i5-4278U 2600 MHz (2 cores)
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 6590
"A pig that doesn't fly is just a pig."
-
- Banned
- 1374 posts since 5 May, 2007 from Finland
Umm. Partly related.. There's interesting numbers over at the Geekbench database.
-Mac Pro (Late 2013)
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 3.05 GHz
1 processor, 12 cores, 24 threads
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 37041
-Dell Inc. PowerEdge R920
Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2 @ 3.10 GHz
4 processors, 60 cores, 120 threads
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 143028
Crazy..
-Mac Pro (Late 2013)
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 3.05 GHz
1 processor, 12 cores, 24 threads
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 37041
-Dell Inc. PowerEdge R920
Intel Xeon E7-4880 v2 @ 3.10 GHz
4 processors, 60 cores, 120 threads
Benchmark 64-Bit Multicore: 143028
Crazy..
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 511 posts since 15 Dec, 2012 from Waunakee, Wiscompton
How's this one look:standalone wrote:http://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks#4
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbenc ... %20bits:64
I doubt this lasts long, but I just found this listed on Craigslist. 64 bit multi core performance looks impressive compared to newer machines. Is that relevant to audio performance?
- KVRAF
- 5805 posts since 8 May, 2008 from ssssskipping ......... I left you there
Yes, it's the main thing if you want to run more plugins inside a daw, more tracks, etc.
"A pig that doesn't fly is just a pig."