It's nice to know I'm not the only one who thinks this. When I first saw the G5 I thought to myself, "Okay, there's the prototype with just the frame. When are they going to add a case to it?"AD80 wrote:I dont know who decided the G5 was sexy looking. To me it looks like some sort of meat locker. Its enormous for no reason and has no color. Bleh.
Apple ditches IBM power PC chip and will use Intel.
-
- KVRAF
- 2278 posts since 8 Apr, 2003 from Texas
-
- KVRer
- 24 posts since 19 Nov, 2003
They probably meant to say "IBM's PowerPC architeture"realmarco wrote:one thing that puzzles me is why they said since 1994 the mac used ibm powerpc processors...i thought it was motorolla and then ibm(recently)
one thing is for sure my ibm stock dropped ...lost 10k on the market
-
- KVRist
- 85 posts since 2 Nov, 2003
Done.egbert wrote:egbert wrote:irect quote from Sascha you have attributed to me. I hate ashtrays. Perhaps you could edit the post - just get rid of "egbert wrote:" from the message text.
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6196 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Yup, worst design they came up with, hated the original ibooks too.LBN wrote:It's nice to know I'm not the only one who thinks this. When I first saw the G5 I thought to myself, "Okay, there's the prototype with just the frame. When are they going to add a case to it?"AD80 wrote:I dont know who decided the G5 was sexy looking. To me it looks like some sort of meat locker. Its enormous for no reason and has no color. Bleh.
The powerbooks however, are about as good as it gets, too bad they'll probably f**k it up by the time the Intel powerbooks come out..... I can just see some bronze thing with holes in it, and "Intel Inside" pasted on it.
- KVRian
- 993 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
Yep... will intel x86 architecture be the goal of apple?
What a poor f**king choice...
What a poor f**king choice...