Login / Register  0 items | $0.00 New What is KVR? Submit News Advertise

What should the next T-Chain modules be?

More EQs
5
16%
More Compressors
5
16%
Delays/Chorus effects
1
3%
Reverb
1
3%
Clippers
4
13%
Saturation/Distortion
7
23%
Lofi bitmagic stuff
3
10%
More Splitters (freq, m/s, etc.)
4
13%
Other? (leave suggestion in comments)
1
3%
 
Total votes : 31
User avatar
random_id
KVRist
 
253 posts since 30 Apr, 2006, from lancaster, pa

Postby random_id; Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:49 am Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Just trying to get a sense for what to make next. I have ideas in all categories, but I want to know what would make T-Chain the most useful for you.
User avatar
spacekid
KVRian
 
971 posts since 12 Sep, 2005

Postby spacekid; Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:07 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

I like using it as a drum insert so EQ, compression and saturation are what I would like. For effects like reverb, delay, etc..it would be hard to compete with what I already use in the nice low CPU package that T-chain is. I think it's strength lies in console basic. -thanks :) oh, Lofi sounds nice as well :)
User avatar
plexuss
KVRian
 
674 posts since 8 Jul, 2009

Postby plexuss; Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:57 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

As a user of all your other plugins, this is exciting! I just tried out the demo. I ended up putting all the modules in a cart to see what the total would be: $150 with the holiday discount. I think T-Chain with all the modules is major competitor to Slate VMR and McDSP 6050, of which I own. But the cool thing about T-Chain is that it has those LVC quirks that I like a lot. Now, just to find some budget... we'll see how christmas pans out.

To me the power of T-Chain is in creating a flow of pre-amps and dynamics processors to sculpt tone. so with that I don't think reverbs, delays and the like would be useful. however, if there were a reverb and delay that worked in the context of a larger sculpting chain, that would be cool. in this case they would ideally offer less of a long tail and more tone control - for example short reverbs and delays but with the ability to put them in a feedback chain with other modules.

I'd love t be able to put the existing LVC plugins within the chains in T-Chain. This way I can leverage my existing investment in another form within T-Chain.

I'll make vote...
User avatar
random_id
KVRist
 
253 posts since 30 Apr, 2006, from lancaster, pa

Postby random_id; Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:29 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Turello wrote:A simple free HPF... ;-)

I have been thinking about porting parts of the other LVC-Audio plugins into T-Chain. The HPF from Toned would work. It is specifically geared for mastering, but I could change the filter range to make it more "track friendly".
User avatar
Turello
KVRAF
 
2946 posts since 6 Jul, 2012, from Sick-cily

Postby Turello; Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:39 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Well, thanks (i know and sometimes work with Toned), but i said a simple (free) HPF into the T-Chain let it more usefull because a serious channel strip usually have: Gate + filters, a comp and an EQ (this is my own way, especially with real instruments)... A processor like this without Filters is as a sky without stars...
Obviously i don't wanna influence your choices\business (especially for the free version), just my humble opinion... ;-)
User avatar
random_id
KVRist
 
253 posts since 30 Apr, 2006, from lancaster, pa

Postby random_id; Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:57 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Turello wrote:Well, thanks (i know and sometimes work with Toned), but i said a simple (free) HPF into the T-Chain let it more usefull because a serious channel strip usually have: Gate + filters, a comp and an EQ (this is my own way, especially with real instruments)... A processor like this without Filters is as a sky without stars...
Obviously i don't wanna influence your choices\business (especially for the free version), just my humble opinion... ;-)

So, something like a 2-pole filter sweepable between "off" and 300 Hz?
User avatar
Turello
KVRAF
 
2946 posts since 6 Jul, 2012, from Sick-cily

Postby Turello; Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:04 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Nice... 1,2,3 poles, until 400 Hz (to rolloff some aux bus reverb) should be better but btw ok! Very kindly... ^_^
I usually put HPF/LPF filters before comp (to make sure that the comp not always work, especially with the band extremes that eating headroom and to "dry" the individual elements of the mix), after comp i put an eq to give color/character...
Million thanks! :-)
tunca
KVRist
 
153 posts since 26 Mar, 2015

Postby tunca; Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:44 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

If you're ok with analog emulation,please build un-built plugins.There are lots of vintage or modern analog gear.
andivax
KVRist
 
57 posts since 13 Nov, 2010, from kiev/ua

Postby andivax; Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:16 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

1) resizebale (or presets for) GUI size
2) smaller modules on the left side
3) mix knob for every plugin (i want to see what dry/wet state ATM)
4) upsample module adds noise @ high settings. and it is CPU hog ))
nobuko
KVRer
 
1 post since 2 Dec, 2016

Postby nobuko; Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:33 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Personally I miss 3 simple modules to be able to mix only with this plugin, and not have to add others from different companies.
An hp and lp filter module (like the one in Softube - Focusing Equalizer), but only the hp and lp filters, or in (MeldaProduction MDynamicEq) only hp and lp filters from 6 to 48.
A transient shaper module (attack and sustain only) as the Audio Assault transient.
And a limiter (not a maximizer).
All this modules as simple as possible with the ability to do what is supposed to in a mix, and not consume too much cpu.
Because for me what separates this plugin from the rest is how we can see represented in the graphic above the functions of the equalizer, compressor and gate.similar to the clipshifter (bar that moves according to the limit of transients).
And not a graphical representation like all other plugins have
It is so much faster to make decisions and finalize a mix.
Having this visual help is great,
Because sometimes the ears get tired and we make mistakes that could be avoided.
Reverbs, delays, etc., can stay for later.
And a reduction if possible in the cpu consumption of some modules (preamps).
User avatar
MichRas
KVRer
 
5 posts since 12 Apr, 2016, from Denmark

Postby MichRas; Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:25 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

I would love to see something like the Clipshifter as a future T-Chain module. I have been demoing the T-Chain the last couple of days. I really like what you have done so far :tu:
sebastianzetin
KVRer
 
1 post since 4 Jun, 2015

Postby sebastianzetin; Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:35 pm Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

TL Audio C1 and Ivory 2 eq. Both overdrive so sweetly and i'd love to have them in the digital domain.
User avatar
random_id
KVRist
 
253 posts since 30 Apr, 2006, from lancaster, pa

Postby random_id; Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:26 am Re: Poll: What should the next T-Chain modules be?

Optical compressor, LP/HP, dynamic LP/HP, and Phuzz modules are being tested...

Moderator: random_id

Return to LVC-Audio