i thought you got in trouble for publishing masonic secrets??normal wrote:synth edit said it would help me move , but when Saturday rolled around , it was nowhere to be found ...
synth edit will write you a check , knowing full well there are insufficient funds to cover it ...
synth edit , I've heard , sleeps around ...
What is the problem with the reputation of SynthEdit?
-
- Banned
- 12368 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
If it's any consolation it happened to me too. It still owes me a $90 bar bill that I covered for it...normal wrote:synth edit said it would help me move , but when Saturday rolled around , it was nowhere to be found ...
synth edit will write you a check , knowing full well there are insufficient funds to cover it ...
synth edit , I've heard , sleeps around ...
-
- KVRian
- 530 posts since 1 May, 2011
Its just cleaner and feels nice to have hard coded plugins instead of plugins attached to folders with exploded files. My aversion to SE is mostly based on OCD.
Whatever happened to that guy who made the car engine emulator?
Whatever happened to that guy who made the car engine emulator?
miedex
-
tropicalontour tropicalontour https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=207157
- KVRist
- 494 posts since 11 May, 2009
I think it's funny that the same people that disdain SynthEdit plug ins will be the very ones that rave about a Reaktor ensemble. Both are rapid prototyping environments for sound processing. What's the difference?
Go figure!
Go figure!
My music is a fusion of jazz and funk. It's called "Junk"
-
- KVRian
- 530 posts since 1 May, 2011
I'm one of those people. Under a Reaktor ensemble is a living breathing thing. I often go inside my patches and change something and overtime I form a sort of bond with them. Even if I could export my Reaktor ensembles as a VST I don't think I would because I've grown to enjoy the Reaktor environment as a host as well and I appreciate being able to change something when an idea strikes me.tropicalontour wrote:I think it's funny that the same people that disdain SynthEdit plug ins will be the very ones that rave about a Reaktor ensemble. Both are rapid prototyping environments for sound processing. What's the difference?
Go figure!
miedex
- KVRAF
- 2117 posts since 24 Feb, 2004 from Germany
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
+1 It's annoying to tell a programme to install in a folder, and than having to dig and dig to find the folder where the ensembles are storedWOK wrote:I hate Native Instruments' plugins much more, that will spread files all over my harddisk in any available folder from "programs" to "Documents and settings"
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
The reputation of a tool mostly comes from what's made with that tool. If most SynthEdit-made plugins are shit (& you know they are), then that's what people associate SynthEdit to (& you can't blame them). More & more amazing plugins made with it, that's the only thing you can do to help.What's the difference?
Go figure!
& SynthEdit gets more shit made with it because there are more chances a new programmer will be using it. It's the same deal with a lot of tools(including what I use myself, Delphi).
DOLPH WILL PWNZ0R J00r LAWZ!!!!
- KVRian
- 985 posts since 23 Oct, 2009 from Italy
Some great SE plugins,I use them and they are good tools,I can be bother if they are Synthedid
http://elektrostudio.ovh.org/?lang=en&P ... a03adb15fc
http://www.tubeohm.com/TubeOhm/HOME.html
http://robersonaudio.tk/
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/superwa ... _superwave
http://www.delamancha.co.uk/plugins.htm
and many more
http://elektrostudio.ovh.org/?lang=en&P ... a03adb15fc
http://www.tubeohm.com/TubeOhm/HOME.html
http://robersonaudio.tk/
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/superwa ... _superwave
http://www.delamancha.co.uk/plugins.htm
and many more
12 years old PC running :Reaper;Reason;Dune;Zampler;Kontakr;Reaktor;and many others countless vst
- KVRAF
- 23102 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
This is not NI's fault.Numanoid wrote:+1 It's annoying to tell a programme to install in a folder, and than having to dig and dig to find the folder where the ensembles are storedWOK wrote:I hate Native Instruments' plugins much more, that will spread files all over my harddisk in any available folder from "programs" to "Documents and settings"
User files (such as your presets) are always placed in Documents and Settings/Users. Those are Microsoft's programming guidelines ever since Windows Vista. Or was it XP? Anyways, since Vista, applications that aren't ran under administrator privileges are NOT allowed to write within Program Files folders. This is for security reasons. That's why Documents And Settings folder is there (or, on Vista/W7, "Users" folder).
Regarding Reaktor ensembles, you can set the locations of both the factory content and user content folders yourself (File->Preferences->Directories). Ensembles you put there will always be there. This is pretty explicit, and Reaktor doesn't write its files anywhere else but these folders, to my knowledge.
- KVRAF
- 23102 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
sonicfire wrote:Just use jBridge. Its already awesome.EvilDragon wrote:Yeh, pretty much. But 64-bit is going to happen in due time, there's a beta out there. Mac support probably not quite yet.
It's going to be awesome when OP-X PRO II, Elektrostudio, etc., become native x64.
I use Reaper's own bridge for the time being (why pay for jBridge when Reaper has it, and I paid for it already?), but I'm much happier when I run all plugins natively in 64 bits without any bridging whatsoever. So this is my expectation for SynthEdit's future, hoping that the plugins that I already have and use be natively x64, so that ultimately I can only have one VST folder on my hard drive, instead of two (separate 64- and 32-bit VST folders).
Call it OCD, I don't care. I just want that to happen.
- KVRAF
- 9077 posts since 28 May, 2005 from Netherneverlands
I'm afraid that won't happen for most of the SE plugins that you use right now. The 64-bit version requires 64-bit SEMS (modules). Current 32-bit SEMS are not compatible, and will not be supported via a 32-bit bridge. This means at first most existing project files will not work in the 64-bit version because the SEMs are not available.EvilDragon wrote: So this is my expectation for SynthEdit's future, hoping that the plugins that I already have and use be natively x64, so that ultimately I can only have one VST folder on my hard drive, instead of two (separate 64- and 32-bit VST folders).
A lot of developers use 3rd party modules from different sources for their plugins. Those modules would all have to be rebuild (a lot of work) for 64-bit by their developers.
Chris Kerry for instance, has made an enormous amount of SE modules. It would take him almost a life-time to convert all of them to 64-bit (which he won;t do, he already said).
And there are a lot more SE module developers..
No band limits, aliasing is the noise of freedom!
- KVRAF
- 23102 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
At least OP-X could do. Peter wrote his own modules for that one, IIRC? And I suppose he himself would want to see his creation in 64-bit native as wel.
All Elektrostudio synths use only a couple of modules (DH_MIDI CONTROL MEISTER_A and B, DH_DBTOVOLTAGE, DH_VOLTAGETODB, CK_HOST_CLOCK, CK_VARI_CLOCK_PULSE), surely at least those could be ported.
All Elektrostudio synths use only a couple of modules (DH_MIDI CONTROL MEISTER_A and B, DH_DBTOVOLTAGE, DH_VOLTAGETODB, CK_HOST_CLOCK, CK_VARI_CLOCK_PULSE), surely at least those could be ported.
-
- Banned
- 12368 posts since 30 Apr, 2002 from i might peeramid
the reputation of a tool mostly comes from what is said about it. or, not said.tony tony chopper wrote: The reputation of a tool mostly comes from what's made with that tool.
you come and go, you come and go. amitabha neither a follower nor a leader be tagore "where roads are made i lose my way" where there is certainty, consideration is absent.
-
tony tony chopper tony tony chopper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3103
- KVRAF
- 3561 posts since 20 Jun, 2002
& what's said about it comes from what's made using it.the reputation of a tool mostly comes from what is said about it. or, not said.
Do you think people are bashing SE-made plugins for fun, for the name? Once you've tried a couple of SE plugins and they were all crap, whenever a new SE plugin comes up you may not bother to try it, it doesn't matter how good it can be, it suffers from the image of the other plugins.
If you really believe people are bashing SE plugins for some obscure technical reason that only a few have heard about..
DOLPH WILL PWNZ0R J00r LAWZ!!!!