KVR Audio

4damind · Post by **4damind** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:05 pm

What I have seen after some minutes is very, very good. Try it yourself!

http://www.112db.com/redline/equalizer/

sunny_j · Post by **sunny_j** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:50 pm

takes a long time to load

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:51 pm

sunny_j wrote:takes a long time to load

That's what she said.

Cooker · Post by **Cooker** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm

I really like it, definitly not a toy. Its the most powerful eq (!) I've even tryed.

Aloysius · Post by **Aloysius** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:57 pm

She's high maintenance! Expensive! Does she merit it? Let's find out . . .

contrary · Post by **contrary** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:11 pm

djanthonyw wrote:
sunny_j wrote:takes a long time to load
That's what she said.

Lazy Bitch !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.

4damind · Post by **4damind** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:13 pm

Ok, after some more testing, things I don't like:

- Spectrumanalyzer needs a switch "post/pre" EQ
- Spectrumanalyzer should have 2. display mode to show it as a "line", this full filled gray spectrum on the black background is not optimal
- the dynamic Eq feature should be switchable for every band (see GlissEQ)
- yes, the loading time is a bit too long

sunny_j · Post by **sunny_j** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:15 pm

4damind wrote:Ok, after some more testing, things I don't like:

- Spectrumanalyzer needs a switch "post/pre" EQ
- Spectrumanalyzer should have 2. display mode to show it as a "line", this full filled gray spectrum on the black background is not optimal
- the dynamic Eq feature should be switchable for every band (see GlissEQ)
- yes, the loading time is a bit too long

+10. a bit disappointed with the S.A.

penguinfromdeep · Post by **penguinfromdeep** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:25 pm

How does it sound?? Vintage? good? Warm?

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:50 pm

Holy ""¤"#%"&!/%&¤"!!!!

Damn this thing kicks some serious ass! Especially the dynamic bit! Finally somebody has made one that sounds like I always imagined a dynamic EQ should sound!

Too bad it's not on a per band basis but still.

The GUI is very sluggish and the plugin takes ages to open. The user interface could use some small tweaks as well. Setting up the dynamic behavior could be MUCH easier with some more thorough visual cues.

The most important part, the sound, the shape of the curves, is simply brilliant! Literally within the first minute of demoing the EQ I was able to fix some problems I had in a mix where I've been fighting with sharp EQ notches and such. Immediate cure. Boom! Worked like a charm.

99 euros.. a complete no-brainer.

Will now start exploring the demo and see if it is stable. Sound wise I'm completely sold.

Cheers!
bManic

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:54 pm

Is everyone that's experiencing the long loading times on Windows

Cooker · Post by **Cooker** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:56 pm

Is it just me or this demo don't work higher than 44.100?

I sounds great but other than that it seems to need some updates

dubbelQ · Post by **dubbelQ** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:56 pm

penguinfromdeep wrote:How does it sound?? Vintage? good? Warm?

How does a hotdog taste like? Good or bad?

Download the demo and try it.

djanthonyw · Post by **djanthonyw** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:01 pm

dubbelQ wrote:How does a hotdog taste like? Good or bad?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8h3YkDLZS4

4damind · Post by **4damind** » Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:14 pm

It has not really a own sound, but with this distortion feature

For dynamic EQing I like GlissEQ more, same with the integrated analyzer. The different response curves from known Eqs (Neve, API,...) are very nice and can help to get quicker the desired results.

But it needs some improvements, so lets see what comes next

112db EQ is out