Asking him about this, I didn't get the impression he did any of this, unless his modeling of different phase characteristics qualifies for this description.bmanic wrote:
Well unless they model complex analogue behaviour with weird nonlinearities, crosstalk etc. they kind of are.
I said in another thread that I didn't find this EQ to sound ANALOG, as in "wow it sounds just like an expensive desk, how did he do that???). It's just a good EQ that I find has certain strengths. I find it to be particularly strong in low frequency work where balancing phase shift against linear behavior can make for some nice bass boosting. I also generally find that it has sort of an overall "fat" sound, for lack of a less cliched term.
I have been saving the UAD Harrison demo so I don't know how it would compare to that in the "virtual analog" arena, but I do know that this EQ would fit very nicely into someone's kit bag at such an attractive price (even after the intro period).
