hehe, classicA.M. Gold wrote:I seem to remember predicting that eventual outcome to this thread back on page 1 or 2.hibidy wrote:
So there you have it. Full out personal opinion slugfest.
ehem
TAXI!!!!
hehe, classicA.M. Gold wrote:I seem to remember predicting that eventual outcome to this thread back on page 1 or 2.hibidy wrote:
So there you have it. Full out personal opinion slugfest.
5Lives wrote:I wouldn't be so annoyed with IK's tactics if the language and tone they used was different. Why resort to calling this thread "useless" and then posting obnoxiously large images of every plugin so as to call as much attention to it as possible? Do you see other devs like Andy from Cytomic or Sean from Valhalla EVER do that?
It wasn't me we said that BTW,A.M. Gold wrote:I seem to remember predicting that eventual outcome to this thread back on page 1 or 2.hibidy wrote:
So there you have it. Full out personal opinion slugfest.
I have both of em and its true they do sound amazing. I dont know what they are based of off thoughTrakstar wrote:In case anyones interested, Im having more fun with the classic EQ from Iks range than the others, as the more I it try the more I like it. I didnt know what kind of hardware it was based on and so now Ive been checking it out, it stands to become my favorite out of the lot as its starting to make me think it is very similar as is the trident EQ by softube to the original hardware unit. At first I supposed it was just a bog standard Eq that was there to fill out the T racks suite, but was I wrong on this one, especially when you combine it with the classic compressor in mid/side mode. I am no fanboy, but I know when something sounds good, so if you have these FX listen to the harmonics as you keep using them consistently through out your mixes.
I have it but unless they updated it I've had issues and the HP is pretty shallow for me. Certainly a fine eq and I do love the m/s options on the singles.....Trakstar wrote:In case anyones interested, Im having more fun with the classic EQ from Iks range than the others, as the more I it try the more I like it.
I always here about issues with em what issues can anyone tell me. so far I have not had any but I do notice a big cpu hit. even if its high quality I dont think it should eat so much cpuhibidy wrote:I have it but unless they updated it I've had issues and the HP is pretty shallow for me. Certainly a fine eq and I do love the m/s options on the singles.....Trakstar wrote:In case anyones interested, Im having more fun with the classic EQ from Iks range than the others, as the more I it try the more I like it.
hmm I dont use any presets so maybe thats why I have not noticed but I know they do all work ill test it out to be safe thanks for the info thoughhibidy wrote:It's been awhile.........but I'm pretty sure one of the bands didn't even work, or maybe it was it didn't remember the settings.....I don't remember. They may have fixed it.
sorry I don't have better explanations. I just remember using this stuff and have a memory bank in my pea brain that screams "error" but it's been a while on the SSL and the ik classic.
FTFY My Friendhibidy wrote:It's because I have seen another Ibanez, Yet again
HA I just might buy a Valhalla reverb nowvalhallasound wrote:5Lives wrote:I wouldn't be so annoyed with IK's tactics if the language and tone they used was different. Why resort to calling this thread "useless" and then posting obnoxiously large images of every plugin so as to call as much attention to it as possible? Do you see other devs like Andy from Cytomic or Sean from Valhalla EVER do that?
Sean Costello
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement