sweetostfront wrote:Lots of thanks for that! I had missed the going freeware part.Steplton wrote:P.S. In addition, "The Old JB VST Plugin Bundle By Jeroen Breebaart Is Now Freeware!". Highly recommended.
neil.
sweetostfront wrote:Lots of thanks for that! I had missed the going freeware part.Steplton wrote:P.S. In addition, "The Old JB VST Plugin Bundle By Jeroen Breebaart Is Now Freeware!". Highly recommended.
george, how about 64-bit version?george wrote:Check NightShine - http://www.discodsp.com/nightshine
Freeware released within the year of 2012. IIRC that one is a little older. It is hard to keep track though. Seems every week someone releases a good freeware pluginvesereva wrote:I liked the DC1A. It adds some nice warmth to the track (as far as I can hear). Did anyone gave a listen to the SonEQ?
Best car of the year: Porsche X (name it). But it has to be disqualified, as it will be useful to a limited number of people only...yevster wrote:IMHO, anything made with Synthmaker or Synthedit needs to be disqualified, as it will be useful to a limited number of people for a limited time. It is also unfair to other developers, who put in the sweat and the toil to learn to code in C++ and actually implement their plugins.
Nope, sorry.Steplton wrote:george, how about 64-bit version?george wrote:Check NightShine - http://www.discodsp.com/nightshine
You have got to be shitting me with that one, Right?yevster wrote:IMHO, anything made with Synthmaker or Synthedit needs to be disqualified, as it will be useful to a limited number of people for a limited time. It is also unfair to other developers, who put in the sweat and the toil to learn to code in C++ and actually implement their plugins.
Only things developed in assembly language should be listed.yevster wrote:IMHO, anything made with Synthmaker or Synthedit needs to be disqualified, as it will be useful to a limited number of people for a limited time. It is also unfair to other developers, who put in the sweat and the toil to learn to code in C++ and actually implement their plugins.
Nope. If it wasn't hand coded in machine code then it should be disqualified.Quietinthedark wrote:Only things developed in assembly language should be listed.yevster wrote:IMHO, anything made with Synthmaker or Synthedit needs to be disqualified, as it will be useful to a limited number of people for a limited time. It is also unfair to other developers, who put in the sweat and the toil to learn to code in C++ and actually implement their plugins.
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement