It's quite simple. Saturation doesn't increase or decrease solely by a Britson fader(which is why (i am ssuming) you are confused). How signal is hot (read loud) or low will make saturation more or less dominant there.itneveris wrote:Can anyone shed some light on the Gain:Saturation inversion?
By that, I mean, like most plugins, I'm sure this one has less saturation the less gain you apply, and more the more gain you apply.
Let's say you take a track that was already recorded pretty hot, then throw Britson on it. So you use the trim to level it down to 0VU, but because it was already 'hot'(loud), you have to use negative gain to get it into the correct spot.. So wouldn't that just be applying less saturation to the signal, something that shouldn't necessarily make sense in the context?
I don't know maybe i am seeing this far to simple so my answer won't be sufficient...
Where is Compyfox when you actually need it..