KVR Audio

poshook · Post by **poshook** » Thu May 01, 2014 8:42 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObfqPoBFkSw

Tp3 · Post by **Tp3** » Fri May 02, 2014 8:54 am

What are you trying to say ?...

poshook · Post by **poshook** » Fri May 02, 2014 9:56 am

Tp3 wrote:What are you trying to say ?...

how good the hardware sounds and how bad software emulations sound

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:00 am

poshook wrote:
Tp3 wrote:What are you trying to say ?...
how good the hardware sounds and how bad software emulations sound

Well, an intrinisicslly-shittily-encoded youtube video of nothing but hardware certainly provides compelling proof of that.

Here's a picture of some Monster cables; its proof they sound better.

poshook · Post by **poshook** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:09 am

whyterabbyt wrote:
poshook wrote:
Tp3 wrote:What are you trying to say ?...
how good the hardware sounds and how bad software emulations sound
Well, an intrinisicslly-shittily-encoded youtube video of nothing but hardware certainly provides compelling proof of that.

Here's a picture of some Monster cables; its proof they sound better.

yes even the youtube video is able providing compelling proof of that

standalone · Post by **standalone** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:14 am

My browser is broken. I can't see or hear any plugin in that video.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:15 am

standalone wrote:My browser is broken. I can't see or hear any plugin in that video.

See how compelling the evidence is?

Gamma-UT · Post by **Gamma-UT** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:16 am

I stopped watching after the first two, basically because he makes no attempt to compensate for gain when he's liberally boosting frequencies all over the shop so it's not even a good demonstration of hardware EQs against each other or against a raw signal, let alone against software emulations that might not exist and were definitely not tried.

What was the point again?

standalone · Post by **standalone** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:19 am

The point? Louder is better. And if it has a Hi-Fi smile, even better.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:23 am

Gamma-UT wrote:What was the point again?

"I know better than you"

Gamma-UT · Post by **Gamma-UT** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:23 am

standalone wrote:The point? Louder is better. And if it has a Hi-Fi smile, even better.

Only if applied by hardware though. You get a good woody sound. If software is involved it's TINNY!! TINNY!! TINNY!!

Daimonicon · Post by **Daimonicon** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:49 am

We have Kemper that's like 90-95% like the real hardware amps. Maybe we will soon see something similar for effects like EQ's, compressors soon? I certainly hope so because vst effects haven't got better no matter what dev's claim.

Tp3 · Post by **Tp3** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:50 am

poshook wrote:
Tp3 wrote:What are you trying to say ?...
how good the hardware sounds and how bad software emulations sound

.

..THIS ↓

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Fri May 02, 2014 10:51 am

Daimonicon wrote:We have Kemper that's like 90-95% like the real hardware amps.

Well, Im glad someone brought some actual science to the thread.

xtrax · Post by **xtrax** » Fri May 02, 2014 11:10 am

poshook wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObfqPoBFkSw

Yep. Hardware is superior. Because they don't have sampling and bit truncating.
But you have to have some serious amount of money to achieve them for your studio.
And today's music business is destroyed from the search engine companies like Google, Yahoo, e.t.c. They are making billions, but from our hard work. But hey, we will see on the end of the day what will come. These times are the last ones I see. They started to implant tracking ships to new baby's in Europe already. Like it was predicted end times are coming faster than we thought.

For those who still think that EQ plugin emulations worth some extra money :)