Yes software reverbs would absolutely be a route to zero noise Fusion-IRs. I'd probably suggest getting creative and using them in chains of reverbs and effects so we offer something different than the source. The original software reverb would probably be more efficient so it's best to try and offer a little bit extra.MFXxx wrote:I'm wondering if it's at all possible to capture firs from plugin reverbs, particularly as there should be zero noise in the path and how easy it would be to impliment. or would it simply not work or be worthwhile?
There's a great collection of firs included and the briscatis are a great inclusion. Just wondering what more there will be to the plugin? Don't get me wrong there's a lot to get started with and a lot to learn just exploring thoughts and possibilities.
Reverberate 2.0 released
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
Reverberate 2.01 is now out, this is to address a signing bug that some AAX users were experiencing and to support the new installers for the Fusion-IR files which will ideally make the install process a bit slicker for people.
- KVRian
- 1339 posts since 25 Sep, 2011 from New York
After playing for about 2 weeks this HAS to be one of the BEST Reverbs.
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!
- KVRAF
- 3261 posts since 27 Mar, 2010 from UK
This is what particularly grabs my imagination and hoping it will be possible in the future, a fir of effects chains.liquidsonics wrote: I'd probably suggest getting creative and using them in chains of reverbs and effects so we offer something different than the source. The original software reverb would probably be more efficient so it's best to try and offer a little bit extra.
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Will the internal EQ be able to be "locked" ?
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
This is on the feature requests list, nothing to announce yet but I see the value in this.Tp3 wrote:Will the internal EQ be able to be "locked" ?
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
Reverberate 2.011 is now out now to addresses a couple of AAX issues. The IR1/IR2 EQ was not functioning for Fusion-IRs and on the IR2 tab a couple of labels were incorrectly positioned. VST and AU users have no need to update to this as those builds are functionally identical.
-
- KVRist
- 49 posts since 14 Aug, 2005 from Lowell, Oregon
Thanks for including the Bricasti impulses. I used the Samplicity Bricasti impulses in the last version and really liked them. I really need to go through the manual to make sure I'm using Reverberate to its fullest.
- KVRAF
- 3261 posts since 27 Mar, 2010 from UK
Damn there's a manual!!!?gathda wrote:Thanks for including the Bricasti impulses. I used the Samplicity Bricasti impulses in the last version and really liked them. I really need to go through the manual to make sure I'm using Reverberate to its fullest.
-
- KVRist
- 49 posts since 14 Aug, 2005 from Lowell, Oregon
Yep! http://www.liquidsonics.com/software/Re ... _Guide.pdfMFXxx wrote:Damn there's a manual!!!?
- KVRAF
- 35294 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
How do you set it up to use a different path for the presets and IR's? It's a pity the update doesn't do anything to improve the ergonomics of this plugin, the interface is still over complicated and cramped.
- KVRAF
- 3261 posts since 27 Mar, 2010 from UK
You could always use a hardlink within the existing FIR library folder, although I agree as with many plugins. Manual selection of library paths is a huge help with workflow and data integrity.aMUSEd wrote:How do you set it up to use a different path for the presets and IR's? It's a pity the update doesn't do anything to improve the ergonomics of this plugin, the interface is still over complicated and cramped.
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
The 2.01 release was designed so that you can install the Fusion-IRs to any folder you like (either in the Windows installer or via the Mac installer by dragging to some other location). Then when on Mac these files are not where expected and you load a bank it asks where the first lost file is, you show it with the file selector that appears by selecting the file, and these locations are remembered in future. That, or you can set up a recursive search location (explained in the manual). Hope that helps.
-
- KVRist
- 48 posts since 22 Nov, 2015
If that's the case why are the Bricasti M7 Fusion-IRs 96 kHz about half the download size compared to the 44 kHz IRs?liquidsonics wrote: You'll only really benefit from the 96k files if you're running above 44.1k, otherwise it's just a waste of disk space and CPU resampling time when loading the Fusion-IRs.
-
- KVRian
- 519 posts since 30 Jan, 2009 from UK
The compression ratio the 96k files achieved is much higher than the 44k ones, probably something to do with the downsampling operation. After decompression the 96k files are more than twice as large as you would expect.mmann wrote:If that's the case why are the Bricasti M7 Fusion-IRs 96 kHz about half the download size compared to the 44 kHz IRs?liquidsonics wrote: You'll only really benefit from the 96k files if you're running above 44.1k, otherwise it's just a waste of disk space and CPU resampling time when loading the Fusion-IRs.