ToneBoosters, I love your plugins
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 673 posts since 6 Dec, 2015
But please, make TB EQ resizable !
And for good measure, FlX and the other plugins with graphics should benefit from this as well.
It's 2016, people are getting 4K screens.
If you happen to read this forum...
edit: ah, and if you're at it, could you please add the display of the phase ? Thx
And for good measure, FlX and the other plugins with graphics should benefit from this as well.
It's 2016, people are getting 4K screens.
If you happen to read this forum...
edit: ah, and if you're at it, could you please add the display of the phase ? Thx
Last edited by lolilol1975 on Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRian
- 512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014
Agreed. Tb plugins are fantastic, but need for update!
Here is my wish list.
Tb equalizer: auto-listen function. And i want resizable interface too!
Flx: we need to see below 50hz in gui!
Reelbus: mix knob would be very nice!
Here is my wish list.
Tb equalizer: auto-listen function. And i want resizable interface too!
Flx: we need to see below 50hz in gui!
Reelbus: mix knob would be very nice!
- KVRAF
- 2545 posts since 15 Jan, 2013 from L'Écosse
Or, how about ditching Avangate and giving each customer a login so that they can download their licenses from a central repository in case they need to reinstall on a new machine?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 673 posts since 6 Dec, 2015
From the description, it's "Zero-latency processing", so I guess it's minimum phase for the EQ.mementus wrote:Do you know if their eq is linear or minimum phase?
But if you want the crazy EQ, you can get FIX, which is a multiband compressor and an EQ with weird filter types like "Harmonic Log", "Gauss", "Gammatone" or "Spectral Balance".
As a compressor, I've never had the opportunity to compare it to TDR Nova, but from what I know of the Bus Compressor (simply the most transparent compressor I have in my opinion), I expect it to hold its own (although Nova has a better interface).
TDR, TB = no bullshit plugins, they get the job done.
Last edited by lolilol1975 on Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:33 pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
- KVRian
- 512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014
Flx has linear phase mode and auto phase mode. It is a great dynamic eq, but as a static eq, it sounds amazing too. You can use it as a normal static eq.lolilol1975 wrote:From the description, it's "Zero-latency processing", so I guess it's minimum phase.mementus wrote:Do you know if their eq is linear or minimum phase?
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Sorry but doesn't ToneBoosters use Keyfiles? At least on my end they do (haven't updated v3 in quite a while to be honest)Nightpolymath wrote:Or, how about ditching Avangate and giving each customer a login so that they can download their licenses from a central repository in case they need to reinstall on a new machine?
And you can easily access the whole plugin bundle as one download - which covers both the demos and full versions. though I do understand the commentary against downloading a whole bundle. Then again, it's merely 25MB (Windows x64) compared to 500+MB per maintenance update (looking at various companies with custom shops here).
-
- KVRian
- 512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014
They are somewhat similar, but different.
First, they work on different principle. So,
Sidecahing signal is different, the shape that is supposed to be compressed is different on frequency chart.
I think dynamic eq is much more complex and delicated. Partly, your assumption is right.
Fyi, some filter type of flx works like multiband compressor. You can adjust compressor graph by your self (with 3 nod?)
And you can..... blah blah...
Yes.. It is a almost monster..
First, they work on different principle. So,
Sidecahing signal is different, the shape that is supposed to be compressed is different on frequency chart.
I think dynamic eq is much more complex and delicated. Partly, your assumption is right.
Fyi, some filter type of flx works like multiband compressor. You can adjust compressor graph by your self (with 3 nod?)
And you can..... blah blah...
Yes.. It is a almost monster..
- KVRAF
- 2545 posts since 15 Jan, 2013 from L'Écosse
They do, except that the link to the keyfile expires after three weeks or three downloads, whichever comes first. Not a good idea to lose those key files (like I did) due to a disk crash. I can't see why they can't implement a system where customers can download their key files anytime they want to.Compyfox wrote:Sorry but doesn't ToneBoosters use Keyfiles? At least on my end they do (haven't updated v3 in quite a while to be honest)Nightpolymath wrote:Or, how about ditching Avangate and giving each customer a login so that they can download their licenses from a central repository in case they need to reinstall on a new machine?
And you can easily access the whole plugin bundle as one download - which covers both the demos and full versions. though I do understand the commentary against downloading a whole bundle. Then again, it's merely 25MB (Windows x64) compared to 500+MB per maintenance update (looking at various companies with custom shops here).
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Well, this is why you do backups - and yes, I can relate to your issues. And this is why I have my paid-for licenses on two mediums bar minimum.
Other than that, ToneBoosters is a one-man-army. And I don't know what status Jeroen currently has, or how much sparetime, but this is basically a side-project again (like old JeroenBreebaart plugins). And as long as the system works, and the developer is responsive, I don't see a big issue.
Other than that, ToneBoosters is a one-man-army. And I don't know what status Jeroen currently has, or how much sparetime, but this is basically a side-project again (like old JeroenBreebaart plugins). And as long as the system works, and the developer is responsive, I don't see a big issue.
-
- KVRAF
- 4711 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
If you can step up in price to the Fabfilter Pro-Q2, you will not miss the TB EQ or ever look back
-
- KVRist
- 340 posts since 30 Jun, 2009 from moon
deleted
Last edited by replicant X on Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Each DAW has a different sound.
-
- KVRAF
- 2215 posts since 27 Jan, 2011
lolilol1975 wrote:
TDR, TB = no bullshit plugins, they get the job done.
+1
If his basic FX suite was all you had in a desert island , and you claimed you couldn't do a great mix with it, it'd mean you are incapable of great mixes. Big mistake for anyone to turn up their noses at them because they are so cheap.
-
- KVRian
- 512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014
Can confirm that in zero latency mode, tb eq sounds great as pro-q at least eqaually.replicant X wrote:On zero-latency mode, TB EQ sounds better than Pro-Q.
I think DDMF IIEQ is the EQ that OP looking for.
But I prefer TB EQ because it's very light on CPU and GPU.
IIEQ's GUI is a bit heavy on processing.
In linear phasr mode, again tb flx eq has very nice sound as pro-q.
(I slightly prefer auto phase mode, though)
But work flow on ff pro-q is a bit better imo.
This is important to someone, obviously!
(Not saying tb eq is not great.)
DDMF iieq pro has good sounding, but a little bit buggy, unstable for me. So if you want to buy it, then you SHOULD take a demo and test it on pretty heavy situation.