So when i make my EDM house kinda bright musics, i think of my sound, then i make that sound.
i heard that when making dubstep, you just put every growth sound until you get a good result. is it right?
(i think its true because subtractive is easier to guess than fm or additive.)
A question for dubstep producers.
-
Any Good Username? Any Good Username? https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=333847
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 50 posts since 7 Jul, 2014
-
- Waaaaahhh
- 2224 posts since 30 Jul, 2001 from montreal, quebec,canada
I don't understand the question..what is a "growth sound" ?
If your plugin is a Synth-edit/synth-maker creation, Say So.
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
If not Make a Mac version of your Plugins Please.
https://soundcloud.com/realmarco
...everyone is out to get me!!!!!!!
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
I'm pretty sure everyone's habits and methods are wildly different, regardless of genre. Subtractive is very easy to use, but FM isn't exactly hard now we have graphical envelopes and massive GUIs. What is hard in FM (for me at least) is predicting exactly what will happen, and matching timbres precisely. Recreating FM sounds is hard for me, as is imitative/realistic FM programming. But the general patterns and trends in FM are quite simple, which means making interesting abstract sounds in FM isn't much harder than subtractive.
Most of my favourite sounds are based on experimental thinking. I.e., I wonder what would happen if I do x with y, run it through z, etc, etc.
Most of my favourite sounds are based on experimental thinking. I.e., I wonder what would happen if I do x with y, run it through z, etc, etc.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!