Which one will be released first (Live 9) or (Bitwig Studio) ?
-
- KVRAF
- 1782 posts since 4 Sep, 2011 from England
Did you use more than four tracks? Live tries to get each track on its own core so one track should only use one core and Windows is using a core for itself.
-
- KVRAF
- 1782 posts since 4 Sep, 2011 from England
Tried again 8 tracks this time with Z3TA+2 supersaw for each track 2x oversampling no effect plugins added. The CPU meter is 80% in Live. All 8 CPU cores went over 70% in use.
Maybe windows 8 is needed to get all the cores in use.
Maybe windows 8 is needed to get all the cores in use.
-
- KVRAF
- 1782 posts since 4 Sep, 2011 from England
Just tried 8x operators it didn't use up much CPU only 7% in Lives CPU meter All 8 i7 cores are in use just a little when I stopped playing all the cores activity went down.
-
- KVRAF
- 1594 posts since 16 Jan, 2010 from Denver
interesting, i wouldnt think it would depend on windows 8 but who knows. Tried here with z3ta2 and I still see the same 4core usage, so far diva is the only one I see using all of them and thats with or without the optimization turned on
Asked over in the beta thread, maybe Ill get lucky and get a response from the devs. Either way HT still shouldnt provide much of a performance boost, its just showing that its using them, whether or not its actually efficiently using them is another thing. The comp engr in me wants to know whats goin on though for my own curiosity
Asked over in the beta thread, maybe Ill get lucky and get a response from the devs. Either way HT still shouldnt provide much of a performance boost, its just showing that its using them, whether or not its actually efficiently using them is another thing. The comp engr in me wants to know whats goin on though for my own curiosity
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1844 posts since 23 Sep, 2005
Maybe... But, Bitwig Studio is Betterjkworks wrote:Ableton 9 is earlier.
Just my 2 cents.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
we were making all those jokes long ago about bitwig's release time but it looks like it might be the end of this year after all, if that.
- KVRAF
- 3897 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
Max4live went 64 bit today, release is very close.
dedication to flying
- KVRian
- 1342 posts since 13 Mar, 2004 from here
been waiting for this! er, but still only seeing the 32but beta? http://cycling74.com/downloads/maxforlive/?epii=4rod_zero wrote:Max4live went 64 bit today
- KVRAF
- 9576 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
The live "CPU meter" has nothing to do with CPU load, it is an idicator of audio performance ie latency
The lower it is the better the audio performance.
As such it is linked to the performance of your audio card.
Live could indicate 100% but Taskmanager can show 2%.
They are not related.
The lower it is the better the audio performance.
As such it is linked to the performance of your audio card.
Live could indicate 100% but Taskmanager can show 2%.
They are not related.
Amazon: why not use an alternative
-
- KVRAF
- 1594 posts since 16 Jan, 2010 from Denver
I think you have to get to the download through a 64bit version of live, I also didnt see the x64 download but once I opened l9x64 and hit download max through there, then it brought up the right onepwal wrote:been waiting for this! er, but still only seeing the 32but beta? http://cycling74.com/downloads/maxforlive/?epii=4rod_zero wrote:Max4live went 64 bit today