I agree with this, the immediacy of feedback (ie results) is essential. His earlier point about knowing the age group stands too.stillshaded wrote:DISCLAIMER: written after a several drinks, a fight with gf, and on an iPhone . :/
Reaper? Renoise? Im assuming you folks don't have kids.. ha!
I said FL studio earlier in the thread, if they're on the older side (read longer attention span) Ableton could work nicely.
Thing is, with fl studio, you're going to be like <click click click>.. "hey look! I just made a beat!!" .. Boom, you've got their attention, and after a couple of weeks you can be like "hey check out this crazy sound I can made!!" (you just put some delay on the beat), kid will be like... "woa!! how did u do that!!".. that means you've got their attention for a while. As a teacher, I can say that the best method is to trick them into wanting to learn... not telling them "you need to learn this if you want to make music." Fl studio is good because YOU can get some results quick enough to get them to think: "hey that wasn't so hard.. maybe I could do that!"
With other daws you're going to have to start out.. "So.. there's two kinds of tracks.. audio and midi...."
child interrupts, "what's a track!?"
you think to yourself.. "Jesus that's a good question" and finally mutter: "don't worry about that, you'll understand later"..
child interrupts again: "what's midi!?
etc.
again, you just want to be like... "hey look at this cool beat I made in 45 second"
Circumstances also dictate what you can use. If its one kid, your own, you can use your own choice of tool. If its a hands-on, volunteer-led, thing for 20 kids in a classroom full of ancient PCs, budget and other constraints will limit what you can actually get away with, and what they can use themselves. Mate of mine does the latter for film/video editing stuff with underprivileged kids, and sticks to freeware etc for those reasons.