I will not consider Bitwig because...

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

damoog wrote:Not bothered about the name but live is a better program overall with dedicated hardware to match
Hardware part is fair although the scripts are pretty advanced for Bitwig, such as for Push 1. But otherwise I don't agree with this at all. There is so much stuff that Ableton Live is missing that's in Bitwig and very important to workflow. Just thinking about the multi-out devices, the MPE support (Ableton can't even deal with polyphonic afteroutch!), the proper PDC, sandboxing plug-ins, hybrid tracks and bouncing in place. Things are just so much easier in Bitwig.

Post

BrokenTrance wrote:... of the stupid name.

I like Ableton Live. But it's very expensive. So i thought about Bitwig. But then i thought about the name. I'm very shallow, but i think it's a ridiculous name. Even though it's much much cheaper then Live, i don't want to use it because of its stupid name. How shallow am i on a scale from 1-10? Do i break the scale?

Flame Coat on.

Sorry for english, i hope you understand.
You could rename it Eric.

I hear that Moby has over 30 DAWs, all named Ahmed.

Post

+1 to Catwig

Image
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat

Post

The lawyers will NOT be happy! :x

Image

Post

:lol:

That was so good! :lol:

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”