Hardware part is fair although the scripts are pretty advanced for Bitwig, such as for Push 1. But otherwise I don't agree with this at all. There is so much stuff that Ableton Live is missing that's in Bitwig and very important to workflow. Just thinking about the multi-out devices, the MPE support (Ableton can't even deal with polyphonic afteroutch!), the proper PDC, sandboxing plug-ins, hybrid tracks and bouncing in place. Things are just so much easier in Bitwig.damoog wrote:Not bothered about the name but live is a better program overall with dedicated hardware to match
I will not consider Bitwig because...
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 11053 posts since 12 May, 2008
- KVRAF
- 3321 posts since 2 Jul, 2007
You could rename it Eric.BrokenTrance wrote:... of the stupid name.
I like Ableton Live. But it's very expensive. So i thought about Bitwig. But then i thought about the name. I'm very shallow, but i think it's a ridiculous name. Even though it's much much cheaper then Live, i don't want to use it because of its stupid name. How shallow am i on a scale from 1-10? Do i break the scale?
Flame Coat on.
Sorry for english, i hope you understand.
I hear that Moby has over 30 DAWs, all named Ahmed.