Hmmm. The logic doesnt seem to carry over. Wonder why.Using multiple instruments is an exercise in procrastination from experience. There is no way to become PROFICIENT at multiple instruments and I'm talking getting lightening fast with their operation, fingering, moves etc. without enormous time expenditure. That's where you want to be, where music in the head get's into the instrument without THINKING!
Every instrument has different ways of playing, different shortcuts, different methodology to get work done. I think often one thinks they are working when they are taking time to study and figure out how to operate a complex tool like an instrument. But studying is not creating music and getting it out the door.
To get music out the door, and thus get paid, one has to focus and consolidate their efforts and work on actual music. To most, playing with all the myriad distractions you don't need, multiple instruments can result in a lifetime of procrastination. Fine if you want to tinker, but for those who aspire to support themselves financially, it's sabotage...
Poll: How many DAWs do you use?
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
He assumes nobody here knows how to operate single DAW proficiently.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Not sure about that. I rather read that, the way to get your music really quick on the table is to know your DAW inside out, and, learning multiple DAW's simultaneously will hinder that. And i absolutely agree with that point. It's surely better to learn one DAW deeply, instead of scratching the surface on multiple ones.
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Yeah, but who here started with 2 DAW's immediately?chk071 wrote:Not sure about that. I rather read that, the way to get your music really quick on the table is to know your DAW inside out, and, learning multiple DAW's simultaneously will hinder that. And i absolutely agree with that point. It's surely better to learn one DAW deeply, instead of scratching the surface on multiple ones.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
False dilemma, ignoring exactly the point Zexila just made.chk071 wrote: It's surely better to learn one DAW deeply, instead of scratching the surface on multiple ones.
The explicit fallacy presented made was that one must learn a single tool deeply, because no-one can use multiple tools sufficiently for each tool not to be an impediment.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
If you try and learn more than one language, you'll never be fluent in any.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Cant happen. Unpossible. Especially not simultaneously with another one.pekbro wrote:But what if you are able to learn a language without trying...
Never happens. Fact.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
- KVRAF
- 4818 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
I wonder how "deeply" one can learn a DAW? The practical definition of a DAW includes its internal and any external synths and FX, and they can be recombined in different ways. So if you have a dozen plugins that can create different results depending on the order in which you use them, you have 479 million combinations.
s a v e
y o u r
f l o w
y o u r
f l o w
- KVRAF
- 4818 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
Not quite. Children around the world often learn more than one language at once (e.g. school and home). The problem is when children learn language from other children. Then they develop "creoles" with mixed-up language, poor vocabulary and lots of pointing.whyterabbyt wrote:If you try and learn more than one language, you'll never be fluent in any.
s a v e
y o u r
f l o w
y o u r
f l o w
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
He was sarcastic, plenty of people here know english as their second language, not perfectly, but it's enough.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- Beware the Quoth
- 33175 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
Im actually baffled that anyone took it at face value.Zexila wrote:He was sarcastic
And indeed, plenty of people here are absolutely fluent in English as their second language. And Ive known several polyglots, one of the common traits of which seemed to be learning even more languages., plenty of people here know english as their second language, not perfectly, but it's enough.
my other modular synth is a bugbrand