Versioning MuLab files - your experiences?

Official support for: mutools.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I would like to initiate a short discussion about your experiences of versioning your MuLab work files (sessions, patches etc.).
I started with just MuLab's session backup file (and of course occasional backups to other storage media). Later I manually copied sessions with timestamp to a subfolder. I recently switched to the tool "AutoVer", which automates this copying everytime I save a session or other (configurable) files.

EDIT: You'll find AutoVer at http://beanland.net.au/autover/

But there may be other solutions. What's your experience? Let us know.
JR
         _/_/       _/_/_/
    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/
FEMALE VOICE MuX demo :phones: more by SUNFLOWER LAP ORCHESTRA

Post

Wow, I'm glad you posted that, it looks really useful. I've also just been copying folders and files to now, but had recently started to consider using Git.

Autover looks like a much better fit for the purpose though!

Post

Yes, AutoVer works fine in the background (Windows only). The only thing I miss is the ability to assign comments to a file version. But there is a "to do list" with this feature.

You were just considerung about Git, or did you try it? Any experiences?

I was considering about subversion, but I think, it's too big for this purpose.
JR
         _/_/       _/_/_/
    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/
FEMALE VOICE MuX demo :phones: more by SUNFLOWER LAP ORCHESTRA

Post

I use Git all the time at work, but I didn't actually end up trying it for music stuff. Still, I think Git would be fairly decent for that use - it's lightweight, the compression is good and branching is really fast (useful if you want to non-destructively pursue big variations in a project).

But it wouldn't have the automatic creation of versions without writing a monitoring application that would make the commits for you in the background. Which I'm too lazy to do, so AutoVer it is!

Post Reply

Return to “MUTOOLS”