Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New @ KVR
ghettosynth
KVRAF
 
11097 posts since 13 Oct, 2009

Postby ghettosynth; Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:18 pm Waves Plugins

Does mulab read your waves plugins? It isn't reading mine, but, I have some plugin weirdness going on and I'm doing some debugging. I'm just curious if other people have run into this?
mutools
KVRAF
 
9531 posts since 24 Jun, 2008, from Europe

Postby mutools; Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:35 am Re: Waves Plugins

ghettosynth
KVRAF
 
11097 posts since 13 Oct, 2009

Postby ghettosynth; Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:52 am Re: Waves Plugins

So, ok, but, has anyone got that to work with Waves? I get "No valid source specified"


On edit: for anyone else trying this, you have to specify the full path.
User avatar
syntonica
KVRist
 
424 posts since 24 Sep, 2014, from Specific Northwest

Postby syntonica; Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:47 am Re: Waves Plugins

This was discussed just recently here:

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 9&t=470661

The waves shell is an evil little beasty... :evil: :scared:
User avatar
fluffy_little_something
KVRAF
 
11871 posts since 5 Jun, 2012, from Portugal

Postby fluffy_little_something; Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:31 am Re: Waves Plugins

We have had a Waves thread some time ago where someone posted an instruction on how to use Waves stuff in any DAW. I will see if I can find it...

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 9&t=386452

Use the free shell2vst thingy...
heks
KVRist
 
236 posts since 28 Oct, 2002

Postby heks; Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:57 am Re: Waves Plugins

Just wondering if Waves hosting is any closer to being implemented. None of the shell converters work for me and this morning I was really pi**ed off having to load metapluggin to use some of my waves plugins. Its exacerbated (for me) by being able to just use them straight away when I use studio one (but I find MuLab is so much quicker to create music in).
There that feels sooo much better voicing my annoyances,,,,sorry Jo :oops: grumpy old git getting back to it now :D
User avatar
fluffy_little_something
KVRAF
 
11871 posts since 5 Jun, 2012, from Portugal

Postby fluffy_little_something; Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:11 am Re: Waves Plugins

Any news in this respect?
mutools
KVRAF
 
9531 posts since 24 Jun, 2008, from Europe

Postby mutools; Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:45 am Re: Waves Plugins

Nothing planned on short term wrt shell VSTs.
If there is news, it will be in the news section.
You can also always check the change log: http://www.mutools.com/mulab-mux-change-log.html
ghettosynth
KVRAF
 
11097 posts since 13 Oct, 2009

Postby ghettosynth; Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:56 am Re: Waves Plugins

mutools wrote:Nothing planned on short term wrt shell VSTs.
If there is news, it will be in the news section.
You can also always check the change log: http://www.mutools.com/mulab-mux-change-log.html


What is the technical issue with Shell based plugins?
mutools
KVRAF
 
9531 posts since 24 Jun, 2008, from Europe

Postby mutools; Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:16 am Re: Waves Plugins

The issue is that other FRs have more priority.
heks
KVRist
 
236 posts since 28 Oct, 2002

Postby heks; Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:38 am Re: Waves Plugins

mutools wrote:The issue is that other FRs have more priority.

Just wondering, how many people have to request this to make it a priority? Not being arsy just wondering. if it pushes it up the list hosting waves would make MuLab more in line with the big boys of DAWs 8)
ghettosynth
KVRAF
 
11097 posts since 13 Oct, 2009

Postby ghettosynth; Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:46 am Re: Waves Plugins

mutools wrote:The issue is that other FRs have more priority.


That doesn't really answer my question.
User avatar
Grizzellda
KVRist
 
468 posts since 21 Feb, 2015

Postby Grizzellda; Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:40 pm Re: Waves Plugins

Indeed, it does not seem to answer your question, and I too have wondered similar things about the technical stuff involved here, with this WaveShell thing.

Logical thinking tells me that because most DAW's handle these plugins with ease must mean that it is not to much of a technical issue...so why not MuLab?

Perhaps it is so simple...MuTools just doesn't give a shit? :lol: :hihi: :lol: :hihi:

I'm sorta joking, but, um...dunno actually...

Jo!!! Talk to us here, will ya? Please. :D :D :D

ADDENDUM: I know you are working on time stretching & GUI scaling and that is the important infa-structure stuff of the application...but come on, can't you just fix this Waves thing already and we will all shut up about it ...well at least I will!!! :hihi: :lol: :hihi: :lol:
User avatar
imstre
KVRist
 
193 posts since 26 Feb, 2017, from Lituania,Vilnius

Postby imstre; Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:57 pm Re: Waves Plugins

[quote="Grizzellda"]Indeed, it does not seem to answer your question, and I too have wondered similar things about the technical stuff involved here, with this WaveShell thing.

Logical thinking tells me that because most DAW's handle these plugins with ease must mean that it is not to much of a technical issue...so why not MuLab?


:phones: :oops: Why work for me waves?
I do not need waves because good mux Effects :party:
you with mac? for mac logic its ok ;)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MuLab :party: :tu: :clap:
User avatar
Grizzellda
KVRist
 
468 posts since 21 Feb, 2015

Postby Grizzellda; Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:58 pm Re: Waves Plugins

imstre wrote::phones: :oops: Why work for me waves?
I do not need waves because good mux Effects :party:
you with mac? for mac logic its ok ;)


Alright, I'm not quite sure what you're point is here, but I am fairly confident that the MUX, at least in it's current state of development & support is not going to replace alot of Waves plugs...

But I was actually asking Jo a question, and it would be nice to hear what he says about it!
Next

Moderators: muzycian, mutools

Return to MUTOOLS