Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New @ KVR
User avatar
fluffy_little_something
KVRAF
 
11895 posts since 5 Jun, 2012, from Portugal

Postby fluffy_little_something; Mon Jan 08, 2018 11:20 am Re: Mulab's CPU efficiency

Will such audio drop outs disappear when rendering to .wav? There the time it takes to process everthing doesn't really matter, right?
mutools
KVRAF
 
9531 posts since 24 Jun, 2008, from Europe

Postby mutools; Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:22 pm Re: Mulab's CPU efficiency

Yes, indeed.
Caps
KVRist
 
92 posts since 20 Jul, 2010, from Los Angeles

Postby Caps; Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:41 pm Re: Mulab's CPU efficiency

May I ask, where CPU (and/or resource) efficiency being such an important topic, that this topic be summarized with respect to MULab's CPU efficiency?
mgiambro
KVRist
 
170 posts since 13 Sep, 2011

Postby mgiambro; Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:09 am Re: Mulab's CPU efficiency

I know it's an old topic, but I thought I'd chip in with my findings. Testing on my laptop (i7-7500 2.70GHz) I compared MuLab 7.4.11, FL Studio 20.02 and Zynewave Podium 3.2.7.

For the test I incrementally added instances of my most CPU-hungry vst (Poly-Ana) with each instance playing a 3-note chord, until the playback started to distort. Both FL Studio and Podium choked at 11 instances. MuLab manages 12 comfortably, almost 13. On the windows task manager MuLab averaged at around 52%, FL Studio 69% and Podium 68%.

I know there's all kind of factors which affect this, so it's not particularly scientific, but thought I'd share these results.
mutools
KVRAF
 
9531 posts since 24 Jun, 2008, from Europe

Postby mutools; Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:47 am Re: Mulab's CPU efficiency

Thx for sharing your results!
Previous

Moderators: muzycian, mutools

Return to MUTOOLS