|
|||
Is there any way to run windows plug-ins via WINE as a Mac Plug-in?
It seems this is basically a solved problem - on linux we have solutions like dssi-vst which bridges a WINE VST into the dssi plug-in format. All you need is a wine vst host (done), a mac vst (not hard), and some IPC between them (a little tricky). I'm planning on spending the next few weeks investigating this, but I want to know now if there are any current projects doing the same thing. Thanks so much! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Member: #170549 | ||
|
|||
I'm trying to figure out a solution for this as well.
Ideal solution... a Mac AU / VST plugin similar to NI's Kore except it's based on WINE technology and let's you load Windows VST's into it. I'm honestly very surprised that a developer hasn't taken advantage of this opportunity yet. ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. Last edited by djanthonyw on Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
Someone at FXPansion said something like: "We've looked into it but Wine isn't stable enough for the moment to move further", or something similar. ---- At school they taught me how to be. So pure in thought and word and deed. They didn't quite succeed. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Member: #3863 Location: Gothenburg Sweden | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Member: #163296 | ||
|
|||
Stable or not, I'm surprised no one has taken advantage of this opportunity yet. ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
Optomadic wrote:
Works good for stand alone software, but it doesn't let you load Windows VST into a Mac host.. ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Member: #163296 | ||
|
|||
djanthonyw wrote: Optomadic wrote:
Works good for stand alone software, but it doesn't let you load Windows VST into a Mac host.. In any way any Virtualisation will have a slow down at least 3 times. That will make it pretty unusable. So wine is only a desperate solution. But there so many excellent plugins in mac , some of them are not available to pc as well. It is not a great loss really. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Member: #29363 | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Member: #163296 | ||
|
|||
Just dump the Mac and get a real computer or just by a cheap PC to go with it I'm sure there's Win VST devs that wouldn't want their plugs easily usable on a Mac. ---- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2005 Member: #80998 Location: Renton, WA | ||
|
|||
Liquidclear wrote: Just dump the Mac and get a real computer
Well there is always Bootcamp, however that defeats the purpose of workflow. Liquidclear wrote: I'm sure there's Win VST devs that wouldn't want their plugs easily usable on a Mac.
Developers such as? ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
Optomadic wrote: It is not virtualisation or emulation at all. The apps are run nativly, thats it.you are joking , right ? Do not tell me you actually buying the Not Another Emulation or whatever crap ? Oh by the way I am a registered CrossOverGames user , using it to run a pc only game called "GUILD WARS" (the biggest rival of World of Warcraft). It works very good with some minor problems. Of course MMORG are not CPU intensive. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Member: #29363 | ||
|
|||
Virtuilisation is a lot faster with WINE than with something like Parallels or Fusion because with WINE you don't need to run the whole OS. WINE is pretty much native speed. The only thing faster would be to have the program coded for the specific OS. ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
Liquidclear wrote: I'm sure there's Win VST devs that wouldn't want their plugs easily usable on a Mac.
Developers such as?[/quote] It was kind of a joke, but on the other hand there would be support issues with devs not having a Mac ---- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2005 Member: #80998 Location: Renton, WA | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Member: #163296 |
| KVR Forum Index » DSP and Plug-in Development | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group

It is not virtualisation or emulation at all. The apps are run nativly, thats it.















