| Author | Topic: OMG, bootsie has an entry in the DC'09! | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
bootsie wrote: Many people requested an input level dial or pad switch - so, what range should be covered if there would be one?
+/-24dB Maybe that sounds like too much but sometimes, when working with vocals, high boosts are needed. Thanks. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Member: #160879 Location: Caracas, Venezuela | ||
|
|||
Mercado_Negro wrote: bootsie wrote: Many people requested an input level dial or pad switch - so, what range should be covered if there would be one?
+/-24dB Maybe that sounds like too much but sometimes, when working with vocals, high boosts are needed. Thanks. That should do it. What I wish to get is an automatic output compensation for this gain knob. Then the trim knob would still be a trim knob. Shogger |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Member: #153609 | ||
|
|||
shogger wrote: Mercado_Negro wrote: bootsie wrote: Many people requested an input level dial or pad switch - so, what range should be covered if there would be one?
+/-24dB Maybe that sounds like too much but sometimes, when working with vocals, high boosts are needed. Thanks. That should do it. What I wish to get is an automatic output compensation for this gain knob. Then the trim knob would still be a trim knob. Shogger Makes perfect sense  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Member: #160879 Location: Caracas, Venezuela | ||
|
|||
This tool doesn't only "tapify" my mix, it also does pleasant things to the dynamics of the bottom end. Great plugin! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Member: #168030 Location: Belgium | ||
|
|||
input and ouput level control would be great addition but not automatic , i guess it would adjust the output to be alwayss close to 0db and it s too loud for mixing use |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Jul 2004 Member: #31938 | ||
|
|||
Polybius wrote: This tool doesn't only "tapify" my mix, it also does pleasant things to the dynamics of the bottom end. Great plugin! Does it fart? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Member: #9992 | ||
|
|||
Nahkranoth wrote: futurefields wrote: would it be possible make zero latency version? possible if you take off th limiter?
It's already zero, no? it's so close... but no. 7 samples. which is enough to cause phase issues (i think) if I don't compensate. and if I do compensate, the way REAPER operates is it will double my system latency in order to enable PDC. it's not a huge deal though, I can still use the plugin during the later stages of a project (post-tracking). it would be nice to be able to throw it on inserts whenever and not have to worry about any of the above issues. this is pretty specific to REAPER though, so i'm not sure if other hosts would run into this. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Member: #204334 | ||
|
|||
Mercado_Negro wrote: +/-24dB Maybe that sounds like too much... Too much imho since it would be hard to fine tune. I'd frankly speaking prefer even +/-6 dB than +/-24. Mercado_Negro wrote: but sometimes, when working with vocals, high boosts are needed.
A solution could be an one more "+/-6,12,24 range" switch but having too many controls is also not so great. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Member: #20140 | ||
|
|||
I'm using Sonalksis Free G to ramp up my level going in...anywhere from 12-26 dB. My peaks during tracking hit around -10. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Member: #86536 | ||
|
|||
i love bootsie stomp pedal setup.
f-in crazy. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Member: #218927 | ||
|
|||
If Bootsie's going to go +/-24db on the input stage then output compensation becomes a must IMO. The worst of it: I've been loving the FATSO so much I haven't actually checked this out yet. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Member: #116627 | ||
|
|||
Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: If Bootsie's going to go +/-24db on the input stage then output compensation becomes a must IMO. The worst of it: I've been loving the FATSO so much I haven't actually checked this out yet.
do yourself a favour Funky
this one has the most graceful overload behaviour of all bootsie's plugins yet IMHO. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 29 Aug 2001 Member: #1017 Location: Pyrlandia | ||
|
|||
Mercado_Negro wrote: shogger wrote: automatic output compensation
Shogger Makes perfect sense Unfortunately not in real life. I should have tried this before posting that. When Ferric gets driven a LOT (like making it a distortion thingy, far from anything subtle) the amount of needed compensation on the output is way bigger that what it fed into the input. Shogger |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Member: #153609 | ||
|
|||
justified wrote: Mercado_Negro wrote: +/-24dB Maybe that sounds like too much... Too much imho since it would be hard to fine tune. I'd frankly speaking prefer even +/-6 dB than +/-24. Mercado_Negro wrote: but sometimes, when working with vocals, high boosts are needed.
A solution could be an one more "+/-6,12,24 range" switch but having too many controls is also not so great. That's what the VST fine tune mode was invented for.  Shift drag on any control does that.
Shogger |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Member: #153609 | ||
|
|||
Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: If Bootsie's going to go +/-24db on the input stage then output compensation becomes a must IMO. The worst of it: I've been loving the FATSO so much I haven't actually checked this out yet.
I would be interested to know how they compare! Shogger |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Member: #153609 |
 |
All times are GMT - 8 Hours | |
|
Printable version |
||
 Previous Topic Next Topic |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
