| Author | Topic: Uservoice feedback forum | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Jorgen replied to my feature request concerning the roadmap!!
he declined it because the coming next forum is enough roadmap ... would still be nice to now what is coming next - is everything that is marked as "planned" coming in the next release or the next beta or the next live? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Member: #55326 | ||
|
|||
Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33896 | ||
|
|||
funkadil wrote: Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Yes. We all know it doesnt help anything. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Member: #164885 | ||
|
|||
Rottweiler wrote: funkadil wrote: Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Yes. We all know it doesnt help anything. If there is a new coder, then it will help for sure. Could be nice to see updates every Friday. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Member: #148905 | ||
|
|||
funkadil wrote: Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Member: #148905 | ||
|
|||
fix all known bugs that are not system specific but appear on all daws, would be huge step
as it seems my request - comment dissapeared from the shiny new forum i,ll put it here instead, obviously too vague and not an important enough "feature"  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Oct 2005 Member: #84370 | ||
|
|||
1barEnuff wrote: obviously too vague
Yes, it is. Though I completely agree with you. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 19 May 2006 Member: #107866 Location: Chicago | ||
|
|||
Igro wrote: funkadil wrote: Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer. okay so you mean you want to know the exact numbers and not just what the current meters show? it just looked like you were saying there wasn't a volume meter which there obviously was. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33896 | ||
|
|||
funkadil wrote: Igro wrote: funkadil wrote: Am i the only one who thinks that this is cool/exciting?
Hi funkadil. In my post about meters, i meant volume meters. Jorgen responded to this and i made this request clearer. okay so you mean you want to know the exact numbers and not just what the current meters show? it just looked like you were saying there wasn't a volume meter which there obviously was. I meant not fader values meter, but signal strength meter. You know those fancy small lines which staying for a few seconds on meter surface till signal getting stronger and they always updated. So i wish to see them in numerical format as well, as in all DAWs. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Member: #148905 | ||
|
|||
Igro wrote: I meant not fader values meter, but signal strength meter. You know those fancy small lines which staying for a few seconds on meter surface till signal getting stronger and they always updated. So i wish to see them in numerical format as well, as in all DAWs. This would be nice to have... I would like to go further and have actual values shown on the mixer strip. Thing is, the mixer strip is already pretty small so I don't think they would fit (legable anyways). Maybe a couple indents that we know - say 0db, -6 db, and -18db, or the like. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Dec 2008 Member: #195450 | ||
|
|||
I think this is really great, a move in the right direction! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Jul 2002 Member: #3259 Location: 00500 Helsinki | ||
|
|||
The new uservoice forum needs updating because two of the planned feature requests are now completed (step through quantize values & horizontal scroll bar behaviour) - or are they waiting until an official release? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Member: #127326 | ||
|
|||
hudson_m4000 wrote: The new uservoice forum needs updating because two of the planned feature requests are now completed (step through quantize values & horizontal scroll bar behaviour) - or are they waiting until an official release?
I guess so! Wouldn't it be strange, if it was considered completed, although it is only available to those of use who are willing to try out betas? P.S.: Another request is 'completed' too: 'Fix the bug where xtc clips merge drum tracks with same sample' |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Member: #193937 | ||
|
|||
BUMP! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Member: #100904 | ||
|
|||
Some Ideas have now got the status 'Completed'.
So some of you may have some votes back again. (Happy voting!  )
The idea 'Load Modular Setup by Program Change' (just 3 votes currently!) has got the status 'Started'. 
Edit: My idea 'Fix the bug where xtc clips merge drum tracks with same sample' just got 1 vote and nevertheless was started and completed, so I should not be surprised about the priorities... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Member: #193937 |
 |
All times are GMT - 8 Hours | |
|
Printable version |
||
 Previous Topic Next Topic |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
