| Author | Topic: Anyone tried a stomp box before an amp sim? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Anyone tried running a stomp box before an amp sim
I have been getting some awesome sounds by going through various stomp boxes instead of plugging direct when using various amp sims even when the pedals are switched off it sounds better.. Try it if you have not already and post your opinions. For example I plug directly into my computer and go through various sounds in a amp sim and get a ok sound but when I go through a pedal and add just a bit of distortion on the pedal to a rock preset on the amp sim it sounds So much better.. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Member: #105940 | ||
|
|||
I have, overdrive mainly but I can see the value in using others. I've even used my cheap Behringer preamp clone (the one for acoustic, as well as the one for electric, I believe they are both sansamp clones?) with good results. Definitely worth a try. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Member: #217907 | ||
|
|||
Cool stuff. opens so many options when using the sims and preamps and
so on. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Member: #105940 | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: I've even used my cheap Behringer preamp with good results. Definitely worth a try.
+1 Vamp & pod racks, podxt on the floor, and an ah500 for bass for that warm fuzzy feel. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Member: #7785 Location: Puyallup | ||
|
|||
Now you are talking just the pod or whatever with the speaker sims
and all effects turned off and using the amp sims cabs and so on? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Member: #105940 | ||
|
|||
memyselfandus wrote: I have been getting some awesome sounds by going through various stomp boxes instead of plugging direct when using various amp sims
even when the pedals are switched off it sounds better.. I hope when you say "plugging direct" you mean "plugging direct to a Hi-Z input". That "even when the pedals are switched off it sounds better" sounds a bit strange unless you have some levels/impedance mismatch without the pedals. Of course I don't disagree that a good pedal before an ampsim can give great results. I don't use any distortion/overdrive/fuzz pedals but I occasionally put a cry-baby or the pre-amp stage of my tube guitar amp before an ampsim (or just a cab sim). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 May 2004 Member: #24383 Location: Athens, Greece | ||
|
|||
It's funny, I used to be king of putting stop boxes before an amp back in the day... until I got my first amp that had an effect send. I fell in love with getting the pure amp tone first and then putting effects after the preamp stage. Often when I'm using Amplitube I'll put effects (though virtual) after Amplitube or use it's rack effects. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Member: #111565 Location: San Francisco Bay Area | ||
|
|||
Yeah ... I use either my old Yamaha Flanger or Boss Chorus in front of Amplitude 2. Sounds great |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Member: #76240 Location: the wilds of wanny | ||
|
|||
memyselfandus wrote: Anyone tried running a stomp box before an amp sim
I have been getting some awesome sounds by going through various stomp boxes instead of plugging direct when using various amp sims even when the pedals are switched off it sounds better.. Try it if you have not already and post your opinions. For example I plug directly into my computer and go through various sounds in a amp sim and get a ok sound but when I go through a pedal and add just a bit of distortion on the pedal to a rock preset on the amp sim it sounds So much better.. I imagine it depends upon the quality of the effects pedal (and especially if there is a decent noise suppressor if a series of effects are being used). An immediate benefit of using stomp pedals would be that one isn't working the computer processor as hard as if one used software effects and plug-ins--which can be a premium to those of us with older, slower, smaller computers. However if you record with stomp box effects, those effects are a permanent part of the track which cannot be tweaked as easily in edits. Also echoes and sweeping effects like flangers and phasers do not always lend well to punch-in or cut-and-paste editing as one may hear skips and jumps in the effect sweep. One additionally may have to set up the pedals instead of merely clicking a mouse to a setting. Overall, I would use stomp boxes if I know exactly what sound I want that I can't more easily get on the computer, and on sections/parts that I can nail down perfectly. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Member: #213420 | ||
|
|||
i've tried it and liked the result.
In general i have to say that i had to disable amp simulator and mostly leave cabinet simulation, plus some eq and post reverb. Tried with Electroharmonix Metal Muff, Line6 Crunchtone (a simulation itself) and custom OCD overdrive and the result has been pretty nice using Guitar Rig 3 cabinet simulation. Leaving the head simulation makes everything sharp and unusable, but if you shut it off and leave just the cab and place an eq before the cab itself you can shape a bit the sound to cabinet, then place some reverb. thats just my experience of course Luca |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Member: #53364 | ||
|
|||
zeoy wrote: I hope when you say "plugging direct" you mean "plugging direct to a Hi-Z input". That "even when the pedals are switched off it sounds better" sounds a bit strange unless you have some levels/impedance mismatch without the pedals. Pretty much exactly. Sometimes stomp boxes act almost as a D.I. box (and/or "high imepdance compatibility" thingy). That'd perfectly explain things. - Sascha |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Nov 2000 Member: #69 Location: Hannover / Germany | ||
|
|||
yes, sansamp GT2 box and then use kefir with different impulses... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Member: #23050 Location: six feet under | ||
|
|||
Yep,
Marshall Guvnor or Ibanez Power Lead in front of StudioDevil VGA sounds fantastic. I find the distortion tone of pedals a bit more convincing than ITB fx. Also, RE-201, DM-300, CE-1 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 May 2003 Member: #7050 Location: melbourne .au | ||
|
|||
jcrisman wrote: However if you record with stomp box effects, those effects are a permanent part of the track which cannot be tweaked as easily in edits. Also echoes and sweeping effects like flangers and phasers do not always lend well to punch-in or cut-and-paste editing as one may hear skips and jumps in the effect sweep. One additionally may have to set up the pedals instead of merely clicking a mouse to a setting. Overall, I would use stomp boxes if I know exactly what sound I want that I can't more easily get on the computer, and on sections/parts that I can nail down perfectly. That's how us old folks (and yes I know you could be one too) used to do it anyway |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Member: #217907 | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: That's how us old folks (and yes I know you could be one too) used to do it anyway Hey there youngin'. Watch who you're calling a longtooth. lol |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Member: #213420 |
![]() |
All times are GMT - 8 Hours | |
|
Printable version |
||
![]() Previous Topic Next Topic |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
















