Pros/Cons: Mu.Lab, Podium, Reaper, EnergyXT
-
- KVRian
- 721 posts since 19 Dec, 2003
It's simple:
If you need to work mainly with audio then go Reaper
If you need to work mainly with MIDI then go Podium
MuLab and EnergyXT are in the middle.
I don't know what features are you looking for, but here I write a personal opinion about some of them.
Reaper
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Bad
- Automation system: Bad
- TimeStretch: Yes
- Audio handling features: Good
- Recording features: Good
- Freeze/Bouncing: Regular
- Customizable: Good
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Good
- File Handling: Good
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Bad
- Workflow: Regular
- Support: Good
Podium
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Good
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: No
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: Regular
- Freeze/Bouncing: Good
- Customizable: Good
- MIDI Plugins: No
- CPU Handling: Good
- File Handling: Bad
- Routing: Regular
- Learning Curve: Bad
- Workflow: Good
- Support: Good
MuLab
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Bad
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: (I don't know)
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: Good
- Freeze/Bouncing: (I don't know)
- Customizable: Bad
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Bad
- File Handling: (I don't know)
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Regular
- Workflow: Regular
- Support: Good
EnergyXT
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Regular
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: Yes
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: (I don't know)
- Freeze/Bouncing: Regular
- Customizable: Regular
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Bad
- File Handling: (I don't know)
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Good
- Workflow: Good
- Support: Regular
If you need to work mainly with audio then go Reaper
If you need to work mainly with MIDI then go Podium
MuLab and EnergyXT are in the middle.
I don't know what features are you looking for, but here I write a personal opinion about some of them.
Reaper
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Bad
- Automation system: Bad
- TimeStretch: Yes
- Audio handling features: Good
- Recording features: Good
- Freeze/Bouncing: Regular
- Customizable: Good
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Good
- File Handling: Good
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Bad
- Workflow: Regular
- Support: Good
Podium
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Good
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: No
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: Regular
- Freeze/Bouncing: Good
- Customizable: Good
- MIDI Plugins: No
- CPU Handling: Good
- File Handling: Bad
- Routing: Regular
- Learning Curve: Bad
- Workflow: Good
- Support: Good
MuLab
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Bad
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: (I don't know)
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: Good
- Freeze/Bouncing: (I don't know)
- Customizable: Bad
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Bad
- File Handling: (I don't know)
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Regular
- Workflow: Regular
- Support: Good
EnergyXT
- Piano roll / Drumroll: Regular
- Automation system: Good
- TimeStretch: Yes
- Audio handling features: Regular
- Recording features: (I don't know)
- Freeze/Bouncing: Regular
- Customizable: Regular
- MIDI Plugins: Yes
- CPU Handling: Bad
- File Handling: (I don't know)
- Routing: Good
- Learning Curve: Good
- Workflow: Good
- Support: Regular
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Nevermind, I was not aware of podium/mulab's free stuff.
However, I do NOT approve of using reaper just for free (ffs, the license is so cheap and it's freaking "off the hook!" )
However, I do NOT approve of using reaper just for free (ffs, the license is so cheap and it's freaking "off the hook!" )
Last edited by hibidy on Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Sorry, I just know how people love to use reaper for "free". Not a big fan.... but I'll edit my post anyways.michi_mak wrote:
there is Mu.Lab Free and Podium Free and some guys refer to Reaper as being free either ( despite the fact that it's "only" unexpiring ).
very interesting pros and cons!
- KVRAF
- 7137 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
OK, some of those will be a matter of opinion / experience... Nice summary over all, though.
It has got Freeze/Bounce but I've not used that in other hosts to know whether it's comparatively any good. With it's capability for complex routing, it can be a tricky thing to get right, too, I understand.kyodeejay wrote:MuLab
- TimeStretch: PLJ: Not that I'm aware of...
- File Handling: PLJ: As a fan of MU.LAB, even I have to say it's "bad"...
- KVRAF
- 7747 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
Subjective I know but, as a primarily eXT/Reaper user, I don't understand how midi in Reaper is bad and eXT good... lots more options (randomisaztions, colours etc) in Reaper.
I find I use eXT more for day-to-day messing about because it's so quick but when I get really creative then Reaper comes out, all the stuff like parameter modulation comes in really handy.
'course nothing beated Tracktion in it's day...
I find I use eXT more for day-to-day messing about because it's so quick but when I get really creative then Reaper comes out, all the stuff like parameter modulation comes in really handy.
'course nothing beated Tracktion in it's day...
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
What's wrong with Reaper's automation?kyodeejay wrote: Reaper
- Automation system: Bad
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 13 Sep, 2004
GaryG wrote:Subjective I know but, as a primarily eXT/Reaper user, I don't understand how midi in Reaper is bad and eXT good... lots more options (randomisaztions, colours etc) in Reaper.
I find I use eXT more for day-to-day messing about because it's so quick but when I get really creative then Reaper comes out, all the stuff like parameter modulation comes in really handy.
'course nothing beated Tracktion in it's day...
Your kidding right
Tracktion was my favourite app for years (Not leats because Jules is cool as beans) but the MIDI always sucked in Tracktion and still does
Well it is quite a big list but for starters there are no Automation clips (Although i hackd a working version that a lot of people now useGaryG wrote: What's wrong with Reaper's automation?
Editing Reapers automation is blatantly just for mix automation not for synthesists and so on
Actally you know what if it works for you good, for a bunch of the rest of us it doesn't work well enough but hey ho that is Cockos and Reaper all round, the 80 percenter (Old users know what this means)
NAS
Omerta
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I wasn't leaping to Reaper's defense! Just curious to know what he was missing, as I have found the automation generally superior to the likes of Logic or Cubase. I find the parameter modulation really useful for creative synthesis...NAS wrote: Editing Reapers automation is blatantly just for mix automation not for synthesists and so on
Actally you know what if it works for you good, for a bunch of the rest of us it doesn't work well enough but hey ho that is Cockos and Reaper all round, the 80 percenter (Old users know what this means)
NAS
How would automation clips be better than envelope-points-move-with-clips mode?
-
- KVRAF
- 1893 posts since 19 Apr, 2006 from Montreal, Canada
Reaper has a free version too, Reaper version 0.999(and below) which you can get here: http://www.cockos.com/reaper/download-old.php?ver=0x.hibidy wrote:Nevermind, I was not aware of podium/mulab's free stuff.
However, I do NOT approve of using reaper just for free (ffs, the license is so cheap and it's freaking "off the hook!" )
But yeah, the current version of Reaper isn't free.
No, that wasn't me.
-
- KVRAF
- 2427 posts since 13 Sep, 2004
I did post a video when i was still on the Reaper forumIIRs wrote:I wasn't leaping to Reaper's defense! Just curious to know what he was missing, as I have found the automation generally superior to the likes of Logic or Cubase. I find the parameter modulation really useful for creative synthesis...NAS wrote: Editing Reapers automation is blatantly just for mix automation not for synthesists and so on
Actally you know what if it works for you good, for a bunch of the rest of us it doesn't work well enough but hey ho that is Cockos and Reaper all round, the 80 percenter (Old users know what this means)
NAS
How would automation clips be better than envelope-points-move-with-clips mode?
You can stretch/shrink/loop/cut/copy/paste/glue/duplicate/send to multiple targets/send multiple clips to same target/save as a clip to use in another project/plus lots more
If you can't see why it would be better from that tiny list then maybe it wouldn't be better for you dunno
Maybe it is because i am used to automation clips
NAS
Omerta
- KVRAF
- 35294 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
I never use mix automation but do use Reaper to automate synths and effects (especially Kore 2). Out of all hosts I've tried it has the best features for automation - only Podium comes close and only Temper beats it but Temper has stalled. I don't use clips though so I don't have a need for them.NAS wrote:GaryG wrote:Subjective I know but, as a primarily eXT/Reaper user, I don't understand how midi in Reaper is bad and eXT good... lots more options (randomisaztions, colours etc) in Reaper.
I find I use eXT more for day-to-day messing about because it's so quick but when I get really creative then Reaper comes out, all the stuff like parameter modulation comes in really handy.
'course nothing beated Tracktion in it's day...
Your kidding right
Tracktion was my favourite app for years (Not leats because Jules is cool as beans) but the MIDI always sucked in Tracktion and still does
Well it is quite a big list but for starters there are no Automation clips (Although i hackd a working version that a lot of people now useGaryG wrote: What's wrong with Reaper's automation?
Editing Reapers automation is blatantly just for mix automation not for synthesists and so on
-
- KVRian
- 721 posts since 19 Dec, 2003
Not automation clip, not easy, not per-clip automation, no 'bars' automations. However:IIRs wrote:What's wrong with Reaper's automation?kyodeejay wrote: Reaper
- Automation system: Bad
kyodeejay wrote:but here I write a personal opinion about some of them.
-
- KVRAF
- 6741 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Reaper can happily copy, paste, duplicate and send to multiple targets (via copy and paste). Glue is only relevent if clips are used anyway. As far as multiple clips to the same target goes, how is that useful? What if they contradict one another: how do you know which one takes priority?NAS wrote: You can stretch/shrink/loop/cut/copy/paste/glue/duplicate/send to multiple targets/send multiple clips to same target/save as a clip to use in another project/plus lots more
<edit> not saying your request isn't valid btw: just curious to know how exactly it would work.
Last edited by IIRs on Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.