Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Everything Else (Music related)
Thread Read
What is good guitar tone????
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:27 pm reply with quote
After all these years I no longer feel I can tell what is/isn't good guitar tone anymore.

My hope in this thread is to hear some examples and maybe some explanation of how you got there. I would like to hope that this can be a "reality" check but not some crazy flame fest where people are so overly attached to "what they like" that things can't be discussed......constructive criticism should be WELCOMED, not taken personally Wink Impossible? we'll see.

Here are a couple of examples from the past that I at least thought were decent.

http://www.box.net/shared/kfnzt4e7aq

http://www.box.net/shared/mmnk3f8m91

http://www.box.net/shared/e0yys0jmpp
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
Hink
Rad Grandad
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:39 pm reply with quote
there is no way to give examples of 'a' good guitar tone, only 'your' good guitar tone not too mention for me the first question would be 'for what?' as it varies quite a bit. Form me a good guitar tone is the sits well, whether in a mix or alone and one that I can 'get into' Shrug
----
I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012

RIP Reason L. and Ian B
^ Joined: 05 Sep 2003  Member: #8838  Location: New England U.S.A.
bluedad
something special
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:40 pm reply with quote
Is there 'bad' guitar tone? Shrug
^ Joined: 15 Mar 2002  Member: #2141  Location: gone riding
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 pm reply with quote
Good question, many answers.

A few of my criteria :
- the more nuances of your playing (both hands) are preserved the better, it is complex, direct expression that sets us apart from lesser instruments
Granted, it'll bring out your deficiencies too, but it's so much worth the pain ...
In doubt you can always work on getting better. Shocked
- it should still allow you to play full chords including 3rds and 6ths without "arrrrrgh Shit! " , don't lock you out from the power of harmony
- it should be balanced in volume and tone all over the neck
- it has to work in the current context, meaning :
--- it should not be masked, aka it should cut through the mix
--- it should not get in the way of the vocals or other instruments more than inevitable, ideally it should enhance them
- basically a studio tone can only be judged in context, a live tone (as a compromise) by how many situations it covers gracefully
- and then there are the one trick ponies, i.e. special FX, take Rabin's "Owner of a Lonely Heart" tone - anything goes here, really Shrug

Ymmv,
susiwong
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:51 pm reply with quote
bluedad wrote:
Is there 'bad' guitar tone? Shrug


Yes. With minimal effort, people can get horrendous guitar tone Shrug Maybe even some of my examples are bad.
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:55 pm reply with quote
susiwong wrote:
Good question, many answers.

A few of my criteria :
- the more nuances of your playing (both hands) are preserved the better, it is complex, direct expression that sets us apart from lesser instruments
Granted, it'll bring out your deficiencies too, but it's so much worth the pain ...
In doubt you can always work on getting better. Shocked
- it should still allow you to play full chords including 3rds and 6ths without "arrrrrgh Shit! " , don't lock you out from the power of harmony
- it should be balanced in volume and tone all over the neck
- it has to work in the current context, meaning :
--- it should not be masked, aka it should cut through the mix
--- it should not get in the way of the vocals or other instruments more than inevitable, ideally it should enhance them
- basically a studio tone can only be judged in context, a live tone (as a compromise) by how many situations it covers gracefully
- and then there are the one trick ponies, i.e. special FX, take Rabin's "Owner of a Lonely Heart" tone - anything goes here, really Shrug

Ymmv,
susiwong


Good tips.

I think though when I say guitar tone I'm referring to the entire package (in case I missed something)

My guitars get good tone (well, 3 out of 4 HiHi ) but I'm increasingly wondering about the finished result. Seems to me that not too long ago I was in love with the "tone" that I got from guitar to amp sim. I'm questioning that big time now.
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:59 pm reply with quote
Re your examples, judged as allround tone , imho :
(3) much too limiting, see previous post
(2) basically ok, although it has some unpleasant artifacts around the notes, a dead giveaway it's not a real tube amp
(1) is by far the best of the bunch, seems to be touch sensitive, artifacts almost not noticeable, relatively balanced, this qualifies as a good one. Thumbs Up!

These are opinions, nothing more. Shrug
Ymmv,
susiwong
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:08 pm reply with quote
I cannot hear these "artifacts" everyone else can Crying or Very sad

3 was not limited at all by me, but I can tell you it is "headcase" and was a quick and dirty experiment. Any limiting is something inherently inside the amp sim as I don't use limiting.
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:25 pm reply with quote
hibidy wrote:
I cannot hear these "artifacts" everyone else can Crying or Very sad

3 was not limited at all by me, but I can tell you it is "headcase" and was a quick and dirty experiment. Any limiting is something inherently inside the amp sim as I don't use limiting.


No, no, "limiting" in terms of expressive options, not "limited" as in compressed. Exclamation
Compressed it certainly is Shocked , nature of the beast.

Re artifacts, listen for unpleasant, tiny little bursts of harsh clipping during the attack phase of notes, you hear them best with double stops
In fact, the very first bar of (2) is the most obvious example
The sustain phase can have artifacts, too, though these often get masked by other mix elements Phew

(1) also has some artefacts, though they are much less disturbing to my ears.

Ymmv,
susiwong
Last edited by susiwong on Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
mandolarian
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:26 pm reply with quote
Good guitar tone is what you had before you asked the question. Now it's gone. My tone! My Tone! My precious Tone! Time to buy a gazoo. HiHi

Quote:
Seems to me that not too long ago I was in love with the "tone" that I got from guitar to amp sim. I'm questioning that big time now.


Yeah...welcome to the fickle ear club. You'll like it here. For awhile. Then you'll get tired of us. Then you'll think we're all idiots. Then you'll believe we tricked you into joining in the first place.

Tone is just so personal, temporal and fickle. Only possible suggestion I could make is to go back to basics. No amp sims for a month. Just you and one guitar and one pedal. Get you mojo going. Then see where it leads. Maybe to the gazoo, maybe not. But, the journey is the thing. Take the trip down mojo road. It's worth it. Your tone is bigger than any amp sim. That or you could buy more amp sims and indulge the obsessive aural disorder until IK goes out of business. Very Happy
----
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
^ Joined: 02 Feb 2005  Member: #56758  Location: Raincoast of Grayland
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:33 pm reply with quote
mandolarian wrote:
the journey is the thing. Take the trip down mojo road. It's worth it. Your tone is bigger than any amp sim.
... or amp, fwiw, as it comes from your personality and imagination more than anything else.
Very true. Cool
But I think hibidy investigates the technical aspects atm.
Ymmv,
susiwong
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
mandolarian
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:43 pm reply with quote
susiwong wrote:

But I think hibidy investigates the technical aspects atm.
Ymmv,
susiwong

Exactly my point. Those technical aspects can only be solved by positive procrastination or other metaphysical slights of fancy. Investigating them by talking about them on KVR can only lead to one thing...

More talking. Laughing
----
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
^ Joined: 02 Feb 2005  Member: #56758  Location: Raincoast of Grayland
Hink
Rad Grandad
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:54 pm reply with quote
susiwong wrote:
Good question, many answers.

A few of my criteria :
- the more nuances of your playing (both hands) are preserved the better, it is complex, direct expression that sets us apart from lesser instruments
Granted, it'll bring out your deficiencies too, but it's so much worth the pain ...
In doubt you can always work on getting better. Shocked
- it should still allow you to play full chords including 3rds and 6ths without "arrrrrgh Shit! " , don't lock you out from the power of harmony
- it should be balanced in volume and tone all over the neck
- it has to work in the current context, meaning :
--- it should not be masked, aka it should cut through the mix
--- it should not get in the way of the vocals or other instruments more than inevitable, ideally it should enhance them
- basically a studio tone can only be judged in context, a live tone (as a compromise) by how many situations it covers gracefully
- and then there are the one trick ponies, i.e. special FX, take Rabin's "Owner of a Lonely Heart" tone - anything goes here, really Shrug

Ymmv,
susiwong


and here I am thinking that perhaps one can over think the issue and is better off going with what they feel...silly me Embarassed
----
I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012

RIP Reason L. and Ian B
^ Joined: 05 Sep 2003  Member: #8838  Location: New England U.S.A.
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:54 pm reply with quote
mandolarian wrote:
susiwong wrote:

But I think hibidy investigates the technical aspects atm.
Ymmv,
susiwong

Exactly my point. Those technical aspects can only be solved by positive procrastination or other metaphysical slights of fancy. Investigating them by talking about them on KVR can only lead to one thing...

More talking. Laughing

"procrastination" has an artifact at the beginning of the 2nd syllable. Razz
Btw, if you heard me talking it was meant for the cat.
I'm a silent poster. Cool
Lol,
susiwong
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
susiwong
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:58 pm reply with quote
Hink wrote:
and here I am thinking that perhaps one can over think the issue and is better off going with what they feel...silly me Embarassed

you're perfectly right, of course.
Different approaches, that's all. Shrug
We had a little OD- and chorus shootout today, so I'm still in analytical mode I guess.
Ymmv,
susiwong
^ Joined: 29 Feb 2004  Member: #14667  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 1 of 20
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012