|
|||
rlahalla wrote: Yeah, BTW, FF suck hard now. I open it on occasion to see if they fixed the insane memory bug, but alas, it reaches nearly 4GB of Ram. FF1+2 + Sweet!! FF3+ = Superfuckingshittyexperience. Opera all the way bitches.
I thought I had it bad.. FF here will eat a bit over 1 GB if I let it sit for a few days. by the time it gets there it is so sluggish its time to dump and start fresh... right now it is eating around 800mb... I figure I have another day or so before its time to dump. I like Firebug and the general experience (sans memory leak) to give up FF just yet... The topic made me laugh out loud though.. seems like they are slapping larger numbers on similar products doesnt it? ---- "Use the talents you possess, for the woods would be very silent if no birds sang except the best." - Henry Van Dyke |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Mar 2002 Member: #2027 Location: in a state of confusion | ||
|
|||
Are you guys doing like heavy porn or something? 
Seriously, how much am I online? Hint anyone? 
It says the same ram usage as it did when I started the computer half a day ago  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
geroyannis wrote: DownThemAll has never stopped working for me.
On versions it is not sympatico with it comes up as incompatible. This happened to me on Thunderbird so I reinstalled T3. I just checked and DTA has caught up to FF8 as of Oct 10. What do you think of the new version(s)? I have stayed on v3 after a bad experience running 4 beta and 3 in parallel. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2001 Member: #1279 Location: my bolthole in the south pacific | ||
|
|||
egbert wrote: I just checked and DTA has caught up to FF8 as of Oct 10. What do you think of the new version(s)?
I have stayed on v3 after a bad experience running 4 beta and 3 in parallel. geroyannis wrote: [..] I just think that Firefox is a lot better now than what it was at version 3.
That. It's lighter, faster and even looks better. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Apr 2004 Member: #19410 Location: Athens, Greece | ||
|
|||
With all the hoopla about 64bit hosts/plugins, I only run 64 bit browsers now. With Waterfox, the memory leaks sound bigger and better.  ---- perception: the stuff reality is made of. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56758 Location: Raincoast of Grayland | ||
|
|||
I switched from FF to Chrome but then chrome has its bugs too like windows behind the browser starting to appear on top of it aswell as a few other things, it had massive memory usage and i didnt like all the processes it runs too... so i switched back to FF7 (now FF8) and it has been great, I dont get memory problems with it.. Opera is good but lacks extra functionality in form of add-ons as they hardly have any and are limited to what they can do (more limited than chromes add-on capabilitys) - FF tops them all for extra functionality.
when it comes to benchmarks Chrome always comes out on top but in practice I dont think its noticeable |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Member: #235017 | ||
|
|||
Rather than making a new thread, I thought I'd just update this one and ask here.
FF 9 running fairly groovy here BUT......I HATE the bottom left corner popping up the display if I hover over a web link (annoying) Anyone know how to get rid of it? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Found it (kinda)
Status 4 Evar. But now the blank line is down there. Would love for the white strip to go away AND not have that url status displayed. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Ah, found that quickly.
"show close button" then just close it. Nice! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
goes to 11 now.
won't be long before I edit this again to 13, 14, |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
I hear that the release numbers are going to be in hex soon.
I wish I could be arsed to read v11's release notes. Will installing it do anything except break addon compatibility? Mebbe I'll wait a few days and let the other guys beta test! ---- "are we there yet?" |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Member: #92098 Location: Devon, England | ||
|
|||
my xp puter has no problems with version 3.6.16 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Member: #8029 Location: outer rim | ||
|
|||
what a ghostism - all good here with 3.6.28  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 May 2003 Member: #7016 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
hibidy wrote: Are you guys doing like heavy porn or something?
Wait a second... too much porn can tax your resources? I thought that was a myth! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Jul 2008 Member: #184569 | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Member: #50793 |
| KVR Forum Index » Computer Setup and System Configuration | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
