What is KVR Audio? | Submit News | Advertise | Developer Account

Options (Affects News & Product results only):

OS:
Format:
Include:
Quick Search KVR

"Quick Search" KVR Audio's Product Database, News Items, Developer Listings, Forum Topics and videos here. For advanced Product Database searching please use the full product search. For the forum you can use the phpBB forum search.

To utilize the power of Google you can use the integrated Google Site Search.

Products 0

Developers 0

News 0

Forum 0

Videos 0

Search  

How does Guitar Rig 5 compare to Amplitube 3 for CPU/Ram usage?

VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Effects discussion

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

KVRAF
 
3879 posts since 28 Apr, 2006

Postby memyselfandus; Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:55 pm How does Guitar Rig 5 compare to Amplitube 3 for CPU/Ram usage?

How does Guitar Rig 5 compare to Amplitube 3 as far as how many instances you can use in a project and or CPU/Ram usage between the two and all that jazz?
Last edited by memyselfandus on Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
KVRAF
 
6090 posts since 4 Oct, 2007, from A shitty little village that I will re-escape soon
    

Postby Dean Aka Nekro; Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:10 pm

I can not say for sure but i would have a guess that GR5 would be less resource intensive than AT3. I am sure someone/somebodies with both will be able to tell you for sure

Best

Dean
chj
KVRian
 
1184 posts since 28 Apr, 2008

Postby chj; Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:21 pm

I only have Amplitube 3 free. But a quick comparison of similar setups shows Guitar Rig 5 takes more cpu. High quality mode 13% vs 20%, low quality mode 6% vs. 12%.
Last edited by chj on Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
KVRAF
 
3642 posts since 12 May, 2008

Postby Echoes in the Attic; Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:24 pm

It all depends what effects and devices you have loaded in each but basic comparable amp setups will use pretty comparable CPU in both, sometimes less in guitar rig. Guitar rig uses much less ram though, like a third.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit. Once I have something clever, I will certainly fill it in.
KVRAF
 
1584 posts since 22 Apr, 2011, from The House of Zaid

Postby @midnight; Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:26 pm

Guitar Rig uses about 3-4% on a standard guitar preset (1 amp 1 cab, a few stompboxes) on low quality, about 5-7% when I enable hi quality. Core2duo. Not sure about that other one... I can guarantee it uses more RAM though if the threads on KVR are any indication lmfao....
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
KVRAF
 
3879 posts since 28 Apr, 2006

Postby memyselfandus; Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:39 am

cool thanks guys
KVRist
 
140 posts since 8 May, 2010, from US-Washington

Postby musicdoc; Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:03 pm

As far as RAM usage, Amplitube as I recall is a real hog at around 300 mb. Guitar rig is a bit above 100. Personally, I usually find more use for Amplitube, but I try to use the packs like Metal as they come in at about 50 mb and respond nice and quick on loading, without instance count problems. Of course, Amplitube has more possibilities.
KVRAF
 
40144 posts since 20 Dec, 2005

Postby hibidy; Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:24 pm

AT3.7 takes less cpu in general, but more ram. This is with HI res for both.

If there is something specific I can do as a comparison let me know.

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

Return to Effects