VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Effects discussion
Moderator: Moderators (Main)
by Echoes in the Attic; Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:24 pm
It all depends what effects and devices you have loaded in each but basic comparable amp setups will use pretty comparable CPU in both, sometimes less in guitar rig. Guitar rig uses much less ram though, like a third.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit. Once I have something clever, I will certainly fill it in.
by @midnight; Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:26 pm
Guitar Rig uses about 3-4% on a standard guitar preset (1 amp 1 cab, a few stompboxes) on low quality, about 5-7% when I enable hi quality. Core2duo. Not sure about that other one... I can guarantee it uses more RAM though if the threads on KVR are any indication lmfao....
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
by musicdoc; Fri Dec 02, 2011 10:03 pm
As far as RAM usage, Amplitube as I recall is a real hog at around 300 mb. Guitar rig is a bit above 100. Personally, I usually find more use for Amplitube, but I try to use the packs like Metal as they come in at about 50 mb and respond nice and quick on loading, without instance count problems. Of course, Amplitube has more possibilities.
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group