|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Feb 2009 Member: #199855 Location: Germany | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hey! What about SFZ!!!! ....including fish! --Sean Seriously though, SFZ needs to be there. ---- C/R, dongles & other intrusive copy protection equals less-control & more-hassle for consumers. Company gone-can’t authorize. Limit to # of auths. Instability-ie PACE. Forced internet auths. THE HONEST ARE HASSLED, NOT THE PIRATES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Member: #2546 Location: Ogden, UT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
And by the way, I just learned that Wusikstation supports full sample mapping, editing, and saving of the SFZ format. I never knew that before, but that makes Wusikstation unique in this feature, and a VERY good deal!
--Sean ---- C/R, dongles & other intrusive copy protection equals less-control & more-hassle for consumers. Company gone-can’t authorize. Limit to # of auths. Instability-ie PACE. Forced internet auths. THE HONEST ARE HASSLED, NOT THE PIRATES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Member: #2546 Location: Ogden, UT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFZ is not on the list, because the poll question mainly focus on the sampler itself So if one vote for SFZ, it's not a clear vote like "Kontakt" or "Halion" And also a reason for no SFZ on the list, no script option like Kontakt and MachFive format provides. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Feb 2009 Member: #199855 Location: Germany | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFZ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Member: #218243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FishTank |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Member: #186852 Location: Dark Side of the Moonies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WAV |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Oct 2001 Member: #1189 Location: England | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyforce wrote: And also a reason for no SFZ on the list, no script option like Kontakt and MachFive format provides. SFZ format is quite capable, actually. Round robin, velocity changes, release samples, etc. Much more so than SampleTank for example, which is on your list. ---- "a confession without need of absolution, without need of redemption" |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Sep 2006 Member: #120559 Location: Rosehill Cemetery | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vespers75 wrote: Cyforce wrote: And also a reason for no SFZ on the list, no script option like Kontakt and MachFive format provides. SFZ format is quite capable, actually. Round robin, velocity changes, release samples, etc. Much more so than SampleTank for example, which is on your list. Agreed! And, as mentioned above, I have found a very accessible SFZ sample mapping/editing tool! I knew that Wusikstation could 'PLAY' SFZ files, but I never realized that Wusikstation can actually CREATE SFZ patches with a GUI mapper! No need for notepad for editing SFZ files! It's all done with a GUI. --Sean ---- C/R, dongles & other intrusive copy protection equals less-control & more-hassle for consumers. Company gone-can’t authorize. Limit to # of auths. Instability-ie PACE. Forced internet auths. THE HONEST ARE HASSLED, NOT THE PIRATES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Member: #2546 Location: Ogden, UT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyforce wrote: Hi guys, what's your preferred sampler/format for using typical sample-instruments like pianos, athmos,pads & synths? Ableton Live Sampler/Simpler/Drum Rack/Instrument Rack in WAV format please.
I swim with the fishes ... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Member: #76240 Location: the wilds of wanny | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyforce wrote: SFZ is not on the list, because the poll question mainly focus on the sampler itself
So if one vote for SFZ, it's not a clear vote like "Kontakt" or "Halion" And also a reason for no SFZ on the list, no script option like Kontakt and MachFive format provides. Alchemy use SFZ Dimension use SFZ and most of commercial sampler can load basic SFZ format |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Oct 2009 Member: #218053 Location: Italy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
reusenoise wrote: Cyforce wrote: SFZ is not on the list, because the poll question mainly focus on the sampler itself
So if one vote for SFZ, it's not a clear vote like "Kontakt" or "Halion" And also a reason for no SFZ on the list, no script option like Kontakt and MachFive format provides. Alchemy use SFZ Dimension use SFZ and most of commercial sampler can load basic SFZ format Also LinuxSampler (a VERY capable instrument), and SFZ, and Samplelord. --Sean ---- C/R, dongles & other intrusive copy protection equals less-control & more-hassle for consumers. Company gone-can’t authorize. Limit to # of auths. Instability-ie PACE. Forced internet auths. THE HONEST ARE HASSLED, NOT THE PIRATES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Member: #2546 Location: Ogden, UT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well I voted for Kontakt from the options available, but, like those who have replied above, I'd be far, far likelier to buy some samples in SFX format. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2011 Member: #264110 Location: UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think people are missing the point of the poll. The focus, at least it seems this way to me, is more on the sampler, not the format. Of course, the sampler carries with it a format, but my guess is that he is trying to find out what samplers to focus time on.
sFz doesn't really "belong" to a particular sampler, and it's implementation is different in every single case that it's used in. I think the OP knows that sFz is a viable format, but it's not a poll to see just what format people prefer, but "sampler/format". I could be wrong. Brent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Dec 2003 Member: #10739 Location: Nashville, TN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
koolkeys wrote: I think people are missing the point of the poll. The focus, at least it seems this way to me, is more on the sampler, not the format. Of course, the sampler carries with it a format, but my guess is that he is trying to find out what samplers to focus time on.
sFz doesn't really "belong" to a particular sampler, and it's implementation is different in every single case that it's used in. I think the OP knows that sFz is a viable format, but it's not a poll to see just what format people prefer, but "sampler/format". I could be wrong. Brent You're probably right--it's just that Wusikstation 'IS' a sampler that uses SFZ format....PLUS the added benefit that just about everybody will be able to use patches saved to the SFZ format by Wusikstation. In this case, it 'IS' a "Sampler/Format" that needs to be considered. TBH, more likely, the OP is looking to buy one of the plugs he mentioned above, and wants to know what everyone else prefers and considers the best. If this is the case, the OP probably has already narrowed down his choices to just the listed few. That's understandable. However, it still stands that only Kontakt beats SFZ as the most-supported popular format. And now that I've found a plugin that allows GUI editing of SFZ files, it fits the "Sampler/Format" bill possibly better than any of the others, other than Kontakt. I can't speak for the others, but that is my reason for mentioning it. --Sean ---- C/R, dongles & other intrusive copy protection equals less-control & more-hassle for consumers. Company gone-can’t authorize. Limit to # of auths. Instability-ie PACE. Forced internet auths. THE HONEST ARE HASSLED, NOT THE PIRATES. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Member: #2546 Location: Ogden, UT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KVR Forum Index » Samples, Sampling and Sample Libraries | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group


















